International audienceUntil relatively recently, the appropriateness of using victim testimony as a source for studying and understanding the episodes of mass violence that punctuated the twentieth century proved deeply controversial. It inspired and continues to inspire methodological and epistemological debates among scholars across the social sciences and humanities, including historians, legal scholars, anthropologists, sociologists, and literary scholars. The questions posed in this issue of Études arméniennes contemporaines open up for consideration the status of victim testimonies, and in particular their reception and uses in the historiographical realm over the course of the last century. Yet because historians tend primarily to lo...