Co-located with DL 2016 and NMR 2016International audienceIn almost all existing semantics in argumentation, a strong attack has a lethal effect on its target that a set of several weak attacks may not have. This paper investigates the case where several weak attacks may compensate one strong attack. It defines a broad class of ranking semantics, called alpha-OBBS, which satisfy compensation. alpha-OBBS assign a burden number to each argument and order the arguments with respect to those numbers. We study formal properties of alpha-OBBS, implement an algorithm that calculates the ranking, and perform experiments that show that the approach computes the ranking very quickly. Moreover, an approximation of the ranking can be provided at any ti...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
Compensation is a strategy that a semantics may follow when it faces dilemmas between quality and qu...
An abstract argumentation framework [15] consists of a direct graph where nodes represent arguments ...
International audienceIn almost all existing semantics in argumentation, a strong attack has a letha...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Rank...
International audienceAn argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a seman...
International audienceArgumentation is based on the exchange and the evaluation of interacting argum...
29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 17th Pacific Rim International Co...
The principle of counter-transitivity plays a vital role in argumentation. It states that an argumen...
In this work, we discuss the realisability problem for ranking-based semantics in the area of abstra...
International audienceIn this paper we question the ability of the existant ranking semantics for ar...
International audienceCompensation is a strategy that a semantics may follow when it faces dilemmas ...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
International audienceIn this work, we question the ability of existing ranking-based semantics to c...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
Compensation is a strategy that a semantics may follow when it faces dilemmas between quality and qu...
An abstract argumentation framework [15] consists of a direct graph where nodes represent arguments ...
International audienceIn almost all existing semantics in argumentation, a strong attack has a letha...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Rank...
International audienceAn argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a seman...
International audienceArgumentation is based on the exchange and the evaluation of interacting argum...
29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 17th Pacific Rim International Co...
The principle of counter-transitivity plays a vital role in argumentation. It states that an argumen...
In this work, we discuss the realisability problem for ranking-based semantics in the area of abstra...
International audienceIn this paper we question the ability of the existant ranking semantics for ar...
International audienceCompensation is a strategy that a semantics may follow when it faces dilemmas ...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
International audienceIn this work, we question the ability of existing ranking-based semantics to c...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
Compensation is a strategy that a semantics may follow when it faces dilemmas between quality and qu...
An abstract argumentation framework [15] consists of a direct graph where nodes represent arguments ...