Short paper.International audienceIn debates, agents are faced with the problem of deciding how to best contribute to the current state of the debate in order to satisfy their own goals. Target sets specify minimal changes on the current state of the debate that are required to achieve such goals, where changes are the addition and/or deletion of attacks among arguments. However, agents may not have the ability to implement all the actions prescribed by a target set, nor to rely on others to help them to do so. In this short paper we provide evidence that this notion is still a useful criterion for move selection
International audienceWe introduce a multi-agent, dynamic extension of abstract argumentation framew...
Abstract. Modeling of argumentative discourses and reasoning about the underlying driving forces is ...
AbstractIn this paper, the problem of deriving sensible information from a collection of argumentati...
Short paper.International audienceIn debates, agents are faced with the problem of deciding how to b...
Abstract. In debates, agents are faced with the problem of deciding how to best contribute to the cu...
International audienceDebating agents have often different areas of expertise and conflicting opinio...
When several agents are engaged in an argumentation process, they are faced with the problem of deci...
International audienceThis paper defines a new framework for dynamics in argumentation. In this fram...
Designers of agent communications protocols are increasingly us-ing formal dialogue games, adopted f...
When arguing, agents may want to discuss about the details after agreeing about the general problems...
Choosing what to say is an integral part of multi-party dialogue, whether to ensure a natural flow, ...
Abstract. We present the syntax and semantics for a multi-agent dialogue game protocol which permits...
This paper studies argumentation-based dialogues between agents. It takes a previously dened system ...
Abstract. In this paper we propose a dialogue game for agents to deliberate over a proposed action. ...
Philosophical dialogue games have been used widely as models for protocols in multi-agent systems to...
International audienceWe introduce a multi-agent, dynamic extension of abstract argumentation framew...
Abstract. Modeling of argumentative discourses and reasoning about the underlying driving forces is ...
AbstractIn this paper, the problem of deriving sensible information from a collection of argumentati...
Short paper.International audienceIn debates, agents are faced with the problem of deciding how to b...
Abstract. In debates, agents are faced with the problem of deciding how to best contribute to the cu...
International audienceDebating agents have often different areas of expertise and conflicting opinio...
When several agents are engaged in an argumentation process, they are faced with the problem of deci...
International audienceThis paper defines a new framework for dynamics in argumentation. In this fram...
Designers of agent communications protocols are increasingly us-ing formal dialogue games, adopted f...
When arguing, agents may want to discuss about the details after agreeing about the general problems...
Choosing what to say is an integral part of multi-party dialogue, whether to ensure a natural flow, ...
Abstract. We present the syntax and semantics for a multi-agent dialogue game protocol which permits...
This paper studies argumentation-based dialogues between agents. It takes a previously dened system ...
Abstract. In this paper we propose a dialogue game for agents to deliberate over a proposed action. ...
Philosophical dialogue games have been used widely as models for protocols in multi-agent systems to...
International audienceWe introduce a multi-agent, dynamic extension of abstract argumentation framew...
Abstract. Modeling of argumentative discourses and reasoning about the underlying driving forces is ...
AbstractIn this paper, the problem of deriving sensible information from a collection of argumentati...