The House of Commons convened the High Court of Justice to try King Charles I for various high crimes and treason. The High Court of Justice found King Charles I guilty. But the High Court of Justice was illegitimate and could not try the meanest man in England. Ben Lerer analyzes civil lawyer Sir Edmund Pierce’s views on the King’s role, the views on the King’s role expressed by acts of the House of Commons, and the views on the King’s role expressed by the King himself, the crowd, and the High Court of Justice
The thesis explores James Stuart\u27s distinct style of kingship as a self-proclaimed absolute monar...
Includes bibliographical references.As a people with a reputation for stability, the English show so...
8 p. : ill., port.Frontis.=ill. (portrait of Charles I).Annotation on Thomason copy: "May 22".Reprod...
© 2011 Dr. Claudia Catherine GuliThe prevailing view amongst scholars is that there was no precedent...
This paper attempts to pin down the moment that the English regicides of 1649 decided to execute Cha...
The trial of King Charles I of England before the High Court of Justice in 1649 was, in essence, a p...
The martyrdom of Charles I has been a subject of controversy by historians, amateur and profession...
Charles I was tried for treason before the High court of justice for the trying and judging of Charl...
James I, during his reign as King of England, sought to extend the pwoer and authority of the Englis...
Until recently, King James VI and I suffered from an excessively unforgiving reputation: Sir Anthony...
Until recently, King James VI and I suffered from an excessively unforgiving reputation: Sir Anthony...
Trial for treason before the High Court of Justice for the trying and judging of Charles Stuart, Kin...
Over a decade after the execution of his father, Charles II of England was invited back to his thron...
Over a decade after the execution of his father, Charles II of England was invited back to his thron...
The thesis explores James Stuart\u27s distinct style of kingship as a self-proclaimed absolute monar...
The thesis explores James Stuart\u27s distinct style of kingship as a self-proclaimed absolute monar...
Includes bibliographical references.As a people with a reputation for stability, the English show so...
8 p. : ill., port.Frontis.=ill. (portrait of Charles I).Annotation on Thomason copy: "May 22".Reprod...
© 2011 Dr. Claudia Catherine GuliThe prevailing view amongst scholars is that there was no precedent...
This paper attempts to pin down the moment that the English regicides of 1649 decided to execute Cha...
The trial of King Charles I of England before the High Court of Justice in 1649 was, in essence, a p...
The martyrdom of Charles I has been a subject of controversy by historians, amateur and profession...
Charles I was tried for treason before the High court of justice for the trying and judging of Charl...
James I, during his reign as King of England, sought to extend the pwoer and authority of the Englis...
Until recently, King James VI and I suffered from an excessively unforgiving reputation: Sir Anthony...
Until recently, King James VI and I suffered from an excessively unforgiving reputation: Sir Anthony...
Trial for treason before the High Court of Justice for the trying and judging of Charles Stuart, Kin...
Over a decade after the execution of his father, Charles II of England was invited back to his thron...
Over a decade after the execution of his father, Charles II of England was invited back to his thron...
The thesis explores James Stuart\u27s distinct style of kingship as a self-proclaimed absolute monar...
The thesis explores James Stuart\u27s distinct style of kingship as a self-proclaimed absolute monar...
Includes bibliographical references.As a people with a reputation for stability, the English show so...
8 p. : ill., port.Frontis.=ill. (portrait of Charles I).Annotation on Thomason copy: "May 22".Reprod...