Add to ORKGIs the British planning system flexible, practical and site-specific? Or could it be more accurately described as erratic, inconsistent, costly and time-consuming? As part of our project on Accelerating Housing Production in London, on 9 March LSE London hosted a roundtable to discuss the uncertainty inherent in our negotiation-based system and to ask what a more certain system might look like, and whether it would lead to more homes being built in London. The participants included developers, consultants and surveyors as well as civil servants and local government representatives
This document is the response from nineteen academics based at the Bartlett School of Planning, Univ...
This paper focuses on the contentious transition to viability-driven planning in England, whereby de...
A group of leading businessmen have written to the Times supporting government reforms to the planni...
There was a considerable measure of agreement especially on ways forward. However, as one might expe...
The critique of planning and new proposals to reform the English planning system and “rethink planni...
On 23 November 2015 LSE London launched its new HEIF5 knowledge-exchange project, entitled Accelerat...
In this article we examine the probable impact of moving towards ‘up front’ planning permission for ...
On 10 February 2016, LSE London held their second roundtable of the project, ‘Accelerating Housing P...
Although housing crises are rooted in both demand-side pressures and supply-side blockages, perceive...
The purpose was to consider whether residential planning decisions for similar schemes are made in a...
This reflective blog summarises the major topics covered at our 29 October ‘New Housing and the Lond...
In Britain, as the nature of the state’s involvement in the spatial planning process changed to refl...
This paper begins by noting that regulatory systems are based on the need to establish rights and cr...
Everybody seems to accept that there is something wrong with the way housing is delivered in Britain...
The British system of development control is time-consuming and uncertain in outcome. Moreover, it i...
This document is the response from nineteen academics based at the Bartlett School of Planning, Univ...
This paper focuses on the contentious transition to viability-driven planning in England, whereby de...
A group of leading businessmen have written to the Times supporting government reforms to the planni...
There was a considerable measure of agreement especially on ways forward. However, as one might expe...
The critique of planning and new proposals to reform the English planning system and “rethink planni...
On 23 November 2015 LSE London launched its new HEIF5 knowledge-exchange project, entitled Accelerat...
In this article we examine the probable impact of moving towards ‘up front’ planning permission for ...
On 10 February 2016, LSE London held their second roundtable of the project, ‘Accelerating Housing P...
Although housing crises are rooted in both demand-side pressures and supply-side blockages, perceive...
The purpose was to consider whether residential planning decisions for similar schemes are made in a...
This reflective blog summarises the major topics covered at our 29 October ‘New Housing and the Lond...
In Britain, as the nature of the state’s involvement in the spatial planning process changed to refl...
This paper begins by noting that regulatory systems are based on the need to establish rights and cr...
Everybody seems to accept that there is something wrong with the way housing is delivered in Britain...
The British system of development control is time-consuming and uncertain in outcome. Moreover, it i...
This document is the response from nineteen academics based at the Bartlett School of Planning, Univ...
This paper focuses on the contentious transition to viability-driven planning in England, whereby de...
A group of leading businessmen have written to the Times supporting government reforms to the planni...