Add to ORKGThompson examines the changed roles of the state and federal governments since the enactment of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998. He notes that these changes have created a greater dependence on federal law, a greater emphasis on the voting function of shareholders, and the likelihood of additional argument over traditional corporate issues
Shareholder power to effectively nominate, contest, and elect the company's board of directors becam...
The modern corporation by its nature creates interdependencies with a variety of groups with whom th...
Constitutions constitute a polity and create and entrench power. A corporate constitution - the gove...
Thompson examines the changed roles of the state and federal governments since the enactment of the ...
The conventional wisdom has been that state law governs internal affairs, and federal law governs di...
In few areas have legal scholars focused more closely on the sources of law than in the study of cor...
Over recent decades, shareholders in public corporations have increasingly sought to augment their o...
Delaware rose to preeminence in the incorporation market after a key point of inflection for corpora...
This Article focuses on the timely subject of the federalization of corporate governance in the Unit...
Eight years after passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Congress has again passed sweeping legislation ...
Until 1987 the growing consensus was that the market for corporate control was distinctly interstate...
In this Essay, Professor Romano considers the efficacy of competition among states for tax revenues ...
This book focuses on the federalization of corporate governance in the United States from both histo...
State law gives corporate managers extremely broad power to direct increasingly large pools of colle...
The corporate governance landscape is much different than a generation ago. Independent directors no...
Shareholder power to effectively nominate, contest, and elect the company's board of directors becam...
The modern corporation by its nature creates interdependencies with a variety of groups with whom th...
Constitutions constitute a polity and create and entrench power. A corporate constitution - the gove...
Thompson examines the changed roles of the state and federal governments since the enactment of the ...
The conventional wisdom has been that state law governs internal affairs, and federal law governs di...
In few areas have legal scholars focused more closely on the sources of law than in the study of cor...
Over recent decades, shareholders in public corporations have increasingly sought to augment their o...
Delaware rose to preeminence in the incorporation market after a key point of inflection for corpora...
This Article focuses on the timely subject of the federalization of corporate governance in the Unit...
Eight years after passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Congress has again passed sweeping legislation ...
Until 1987 the growing consensus was that the market for corporate control was distinctly interstate...
In this Essay, Professor Romano considers the efficacy of competition among states for tax revenues ...
This book focuses on the federalization of corporate governance in the United States from both histo...
State law gives corporate managers extremely broad power to direct increasingly large pools of colle...
The corporate governance landscape is much different than a generation ago. Independent directors no...
Shareholder power to effectively nominate, contest, and elect the company's board of directors becam...
The modern corporation by its nature creates interdependencies with a variety of groups with whom th...
Constitutions constitute a polity and create and entrench power. A corporate constitution - the gove...