Add to ORKGJasanoff says that the most effective way to integrate scientific knowledge fully and fairly into legal decisionmaking may be for judges to develop a keener sense of how science works
the Article argues in support of Professor Crump\u27s critique of the Supreme Court of the United St...
In this Article, the Author explores two unexpected consequences of joining science and law at the h...
Scientific evidence is an inescapable facet of modern litigation. The Supreme Court; beginning with ...
Jasanoff says that the most effective way to integrate scientific knowledge fully and fairly into le...
Crabb looks at the approach one court has established to balance the demands of the legal system wit...
The legal conformation of science is not universal, as reveals a comparison with the legal system of...
Part I of this Article begins by introducing the concept of judicial notice followed by a short back...
Courts have become increasingly important arenas for mediating between competing interests in the in...
Fischer says he believes that the uneasy relationship between law and science is likely to continue ...
There haven\u27t always been scientific witnesses: in fact, there haven\u27t always been witnesses. ...
Resisting compelled disclosure in court will continue to be at best a tenuous and uncertain journey ...
For over twenty years, and particularly since the Supreme Court\u27s Daubert\u27 decision in 1993, m...
The Supreme Court\u27s Daubert trilogy places judges in the unenviable position of assessing the rel...
In a world that grows more technologically complex every day and in which scientific research contin...
In response to the claim that many judges are deficient in their understanding of scientific methodo...
the Article argues in support of Professor Crump\u27s critique of the Supreme Court of the United St...
In this Article, the Author explores two unexpected consequences of joining science and law at the h...
Scientific evidence is an inescapable facet of modern litigation. The Supreme Court; beginning with ...
Jasanoff says that the most effective way to integrate scientific knowledge fully and fairly into le...
Crabb looks at the approach one court has established to balance the demands of the legal system wit...
The legal conformation of science is not universal, as reveals a comparison with the legal system of...
Part I of this Article begins by introducing the concept of judicial notice followed by a short back...
Courts have become increasingly important arenas for mediating between competing interests in the in...
Fischer says he believes that the uneasy relationship between law and science is likely to continue ...
There haven\u27t always been scientific witnesses: in fact, there haven\u27t always been witnesses. ...
Resisting compelled disclosure in court will continue to be at best a tenuous and uncertain journey ...
For over twenty years, and particularly since the Supreme Court\u27s Daubert\u27 decision in 1993, m...
The Supreme Court\u27s Daubert trilogy places judges in the unenviable position of assessing the rel...
In a world that grows more technologically complex every day and in which scientific research contin...
In response to the claim that many judges are deficient in their understanding of scientific methodo...
the Article argues in support of Professor Crump\u27s critique of the Supreme Court of the United St...
In this Article, the Author explores two unexpected consequences of joining science and law at the h...
Scientific evidence is an inescapable facet of modern litigation. The Supreme Court; beginning with ...