In (Anglberger et al., 2015, Section 4.1), a deontic logic is proposed which explicates the idea that a formula phi is obligatory if and only if it is (semantically speaking) the weakest permission. We give a sound and strongly complete, Hilbert style axiomatization for this logic. As a corollary, it is compact, contradicting earlier claims from Anglberger et al. (2015). In addition, we prove that our axiomatization is equivalent to Anglberger et al.'s infinitary proof system, and show that our results are robust w.r.t. certain changes in the underlying semantics
AbstractIn order to avoid the paradoxes of standard deontic logic, we have to give up the semantic c...
We present a formal semantics for deontic logic based on the concept of ceteris paribus preferences....
In this paper we present a tableau system for deontic logics with the operator of explicit permissio...
We introduce a new understanding of deontic modals that we call obligations as weakest permissions. ...
peer reviewedThe aim of this article is to construct a deontic logic in which the free choice postul...
In recent work, Cariani has proposed a semantics for ought that combines two features: (i) it invali...
It is well known that systems of action deontic logic emerging from a standard analysis of permissio...
Deontic logic is standardly conceived as the logic of true statements about the existence of obligat...
peer reviewedThis paper reports completeness results for dyadic deontic logics in the tradition of H...
In this paper we propose an extension of Defeasible Logic to represent and compute three concepts of...
Deontic constraints prohibit an agent performing acts of a certain type even when doing so will prev...
In common treatments of deontic logic, the obligatory is what is true in all deontically ideal possi...
A new characterization of the deontic operators of permission and prohibition is introduced based on...
AbstractWe introduce a deontic action logic and its axiomatization. This logic has some useful prope...
It is well known that systems of action deontic logic emerging from a standard analysis of permissio...
AbstractIn order to avoid the paradoxes of standard deontic logic, we have to give up the semantic c...
We present a formal semantics for deontic logic based on the concept of ceteris paribus preferences....
In this paper we present a tableau system for deontic logics with the operator of explicit permissio...
We introduce a new understanding of deontic modals that we call obligations as weakest permissions. ...
peer reviewedThe aim of this article is to construct a deontic logic in which the free choice postul...
In recent work, Cariani has proposed a semantics for ought that combines two features: (i) it invali...
It is well known that systems of action deontic logic emerging from a standard analysis of permissio...
Deontic logic is standardly conceived as the logic of true statements about the existence of obligat...
peer reviewedThis paper reports completeness results for dyadic deontic logics in the tradition of H...
In this paper we propose an extension of Defeasible Logic to represent and compute three concepts of...
Deontic constraints prohibit an agent performing acts of a certain type even when doing so will prev...
In common treatments of deontic logic, the obligatory is what is true in all deontically ideal possi...
A new characterization of the deontic operators of permission and prohibition is introduced based on...
AbstractWe introduce a deontic action logic and its axiomatization. This logic has some useful prope...
It is well known that systems of action deontic logic emerging from a standard analysis of permissio...
AbstractIn order to avoid the paradoxes of standard deontic logic, we have to give up the semantic c...
We present a formal semantics for deontic logic based on the concept of ceteris paribus preferences....
In this paper we present a tableau system for deontic logics with the operator of explicit permissio...