Revision of reversed shoulder arthroplasty : is a reoperation possible?

Introduction. As the number of reversed shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) procedures increases, the revision rate will also increase. In case of severe bone insufficiency, instability or infection of the primary RSA, revision to another RSA is preferable but not always possible. Hemiarthroplasty (HA), spacers and resection arthroplasty (RA) have been described in this indication. Materials and methods. Between 2004 and 2016, 20 shoulders in 19 patientswere treated at Ghent University Hospital for failed revision of RSA. Nine received a megahead prosthesis, a spacerwas implanted in 6, and 5 underwent RA. Results. Indications for implantation of a megahead prosthesis were loosening RSA (n = 5), infection (n = 4), dislocation (n = 1) and nerve irritation (n = 1). Improvement of range ofmotionwas observed. Anterosuperior migration of the prosthesis was noted in 2 patients. Another 2 patients were ultimately revised to RSA. Seven permanent spacerswere implanted for infection, of which 2 remain in place till today. The other 5 were revised to RSA. Of the 5 patients treated with RA, 3 were revised further on to RSA, resulting in pain relief and regain of function. Discussion. Our study shows that amegahead prosthesis has better functional results than RA, but is inferior to RSA. Due to increasing surgical experience and improving technique, 9 patients could ultimately be reconverted to another RSA. A review of current literature is presented. In HA and RA, the functional results are poor, and pain relief is uncertain. Results of spacers are variable and can be satisfactory. Arthrodesis is a last resort. Conclusion. In our case series study, a hemiarthroplasty can be performed in case of failure of RSA. However, the results are inferior to another RSA