The framework of Systemically Important Banks (SIBs) was introduced by the financial stability board in the October of 2010 as the institutions "whose disorderly failure, because of their size, complexity and systemic interconnectedness, would cause significant disruption to the wider financial system and economic activity". The current methodology for their determination is based on balance-sheet variables and expert judgment. We propose a cross-sectional statistical procedure based on a permutation test in order to cluster SIBs separating them from the rest of the financial system. This procedure divides the sample in two subsamples choosing a quantile of suitable statis...
This paper develops a methodology to identify systemically important financial institutions building...
This paper develops a methodology to identify systemically important financial institutions building...
This research examines and compares the performances in terms of systemic risk ranking for three dif...
The framework of Systemically Important Banks (SIBs) was introduced by the financial stability boa...
In this work we propose the use of a nonparametric procedure to investigate the relationship between...
This paper develops a methodology to identify systemically important banks, building on that develop...
This paper analyzes the measure of systemic importance ∆CoV aR proposed by Adrian and Brunnermeier (...
The aim of this article is to identify systemically important banks on a European scale, in accordan...
International audienceThe aim of this paper is to determine the optimal size of the system (global, ...
The extra loss absorbency requirement for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) is one of the...
We identify a potential bias in the methodology disclosed in July 2013 by the Basel Committee on Ban...
This paper proposes a cross-section analysis of systemic risk in the European banking sector. The ab...
We develop a methodology to identify and rank “systemically important financial institutions” (SIFIs...
Systemic risk is the risk of a collapse of the entire financial system, typically triggered by the d...
This paper develops a methodology to identify systemically important financial institutions building...
This paper develops a methodology to identify systemically important financial institutions building...
This research examines and compares the performances in terms of systemic risk ranking for three dif...
The framework of Systemically Important Banks (SIBs) was introduced by the financial stability boa...
In this work we propose the use of a nonparametric procedure to investigate the relationship between...
This paper develops a methodology to identify systemically important banks, building on that develop...
This paper analyzes the measure of systemic importance ∆CoV aR proposed by Adrian and Brunnermeier (...
The aim of this article is to identify systemically important banks on a European scale, in accordan...
International audienceThe aim of this paper is to determine the optimal size of the system (global, ...
The extra loss absorbency requirement for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) is one of the...
We identify a potential bias in the methodology disclosed in July 2013 by the Basel Committee on Ban...
This paper proposes a cross-section analysis of systemic risk in the European banking sector. The ab...
We develop a methodology to identify and rank “systemically important financial institutions” (SIFIs...
Systemic risk is the risk of a collapse of the entire financial system, typically triggered by the d...
This paper develops a methodology to identify systemically important financial institutions building...
This paper develops a methodology to identify systemically important financial institutions building...
This research examines and compares the performances in terms of systemic risk ranking for three dif...