A transparent and evidence-based priority-setting process promotes the optimal use of resources to improve health outcomes. Decision-makers and funders have begun to increasingly engage representatives of patients and healthcare consumers to ensure that research becomes more relevant. However, disadvantaged groups and their needs may not be integrated into the priority-setting process since they do not have a "political voice" or are unable to organise into interest groups. Equitable priority-setting methods need to balance patient needs, values, experiences with population-level issues and issues related to the health system
This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organi...
This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organi...
Background Thus far, little work in bioethics has specifically focused on global health research pri...
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. Growing consensus that health research funders should align their investments w...
Growing consensus that health research funders should align their investments with national research...
Global health research priority-setting is dominated by funders and researchers, often from high-inc...
Plain English summary Involving stakeholders already at the beginning of the research process when d...
To promote social justice and equity, global health research should meaningfully engage communities ...
Engaging citizens is vital to achieving people-centred health research. This paper aims to put atten...
BACKGROUND: Engagement of people with lived experience and members of the public is an ethically and...
Community engagement is gaining prominence in global health research. But community members, especia...
Increasingly, there is a need for national governments, public-private partnerships, private sector ...
This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organi...
This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organi...
Background Thus far, little work in bioethics has specifically focused on global health research pri...
This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organi...
This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organi...
Background Thus far, little work in bioethics has specifically focused on global health research pri...
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. Growing consensus that health research funders should align their investments w...
Growing consensus that health research funders should align their investments with national research...
Global health research priority-setting is dominated by funders and researchers, often from high-inc...
Plain English summary Involving stakeholders already at the beginning of the research process when d...
To promote social justice and equity, global health research should meaningfully engage communities ...
Engaging citizens is vital to achieving people-centred health research. This paper aims to put atten...
BACKGROUND: Engagement of people with lived experience and members of the public is an ethically and...
Community engagement is gaining prominence in global health research. But community members, especia...
Increasingly, there is a need for national governments, public-private partnerships, private sector ...
This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organi...
This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organi...
Background Thus far, little work in bioethics has specifically focused on global health research pri...
This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organi...
This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organi...
Background Thus far, little work in bioethics has specifically focused on global health research pri...