Add to ORKGA bold step from the new housing minister to insist that building on open land is needed to solve the housing crisis. No disagreement from me on that front. But what a pity that the political debate on development is so poisonous that Mr Boles feels the need to rule out building on greenbelt land
Finally had a chance to catch-up with Centre for Cities report on where to build homes for Britain's...
In 1998, approximately 50% of development occurred on brownfield land (a figure that had been remark...
The Environmental Audit Committee has undertaken an environmental analysis of the government's house...
The debate continues about what the government mean by "presumption in favour of development" and th...
[Posted by Prof Paul Cheshire] Almost every reasonable person must now accept the case that we need ...
I wrote recently about unresolved conflicts in the government's approach to planning, economic growt...
The debates surrounding the Environment White Paper (and the National Ecosystem Assessment) highligh...
With a growing population, government is under increasing pressure to build more and more housing de...
To slow the rate of increase of housing unaffordability we have to build on the Greenbelt. But relea...
In all the debate around the government's planning reforms, we are in danger of losing sight of the ...
The government growth review (launched alongside the budget last week) is calling for "radical chang...
Enjoyed our British Government at LSE debate on whether we should build on the greenbelt (at some po...
Posted by Tim Leunig, SERC, LSE and CentreForum I recently visited Bordon, a small town in North Eas...
I liked this sequence of maps from Audacity showing land use restrictions in England
I seem to have spent the week so far talking and thinking about planning and development
Finally had a chance to catch-up with Centre for Cities report on where to build homes for Britain's...
In 1998, approximately 50% of development occurred on brownfield land (a figure that had been remark...
The Environmental Audit Committee has undertaken an environmental analysis of the government's house...
The debate continues about what the government mean by "presumption in favour of development" and th...
[Posted by Prof Paul Cheshire] Almost every reasonable person must now accept the case that we need ...
I wrote recently about unresolved conflicts in the government's approach to planning, economic growt...
The debates surrounding the Environment White Paper (and the National Ecosystem Assessment) highligh...
With a growing population, government is under increasing pressure to build more and more housing de...
To slow the rate of increase of housing unaffordability we have to build on the Greenbelt. But relea...
In all the debate around the government's planning reforms, we are in danger of losing sight of the ...
The government growth review (launched alongside the budget last week) is calling for "radical chang...
Enjoyed our British Government at LSE debate on whether we should build on the greenbelt (at some po...
Posted by Tim Leunig, SERC, LSE and CentreForum I recently visited Bordon, a small town in North Eas...
I liked this sequence of maps from Audacity showing land use restrictions in England
I seem to have spent the week so far talking and thinking about planning and development
Finally had a chance to catch-up with Centre for Cities report on where to build homes for Britain's...
In 1998, approximately 50% of development occurred on brownfield land (a figure that had been remark...
The Environmental Audit Committee has undertaken an environmental analysis of the government's house...