Background: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of ritonavir boosted atazanavir versus ritonavir boosted lopinavir or efavirenz, all in combination with 2 nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), over 144 weeks in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected individuals. Methods: A prospective open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted at 29 sites in Sweden and Norway between April 2004 and December 2009. Patients were randomized to receive either efavirenz 600 mg once daily (EFV), or atazanavir 300 mg and ritonavir 100 mg once daily (AZV/r), or lopinavir 400 mg and ritonavir 100 mg twice daily (LPV/r). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA 100,000 copies/ml at baseli...
Objective: To determine the durability over 96 weeks of safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir (...
International audienceBackground:Sparing of antiretroviral drug classes could reduce the toxicity an...
Background. Current clinical guidelines consider regimens consisting of either ritonavir-boosted ata...
Background: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of ritonavir boosted atazanavir ...
Background: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of ritonavir boosted atazanavir ...
Background: Although efavirenz (EFV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) are both recommended antiretrov...
BACKGROUND: Although efavirenz (EFV) and lopinavir/ ritonavir (LPV/r) are both recommended antiretro...
BACKGROUND: Although efavirenz (EFV) and lopinavir/ ritonavir (LPV/r) are both recommended antiretro...
Objective: To compare regimens consisting of either ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or efavirenz and a ...
BACKGROUND: Current clinical guidelines consider regimens consisting of either ritonavir-boosted ata...
BACKGROUND: Current clinical guidelines consider regimens consisting of either ritonavir-boosted ata...
Current clinical guidelines consider regimens consisting of either ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or r...
BACKGROUND: Atazanavir boosted with ritonavir (ATV/r) and efavirenz (EFV) are both recommended as fi...
Background: Atazanavir boosted with ritonavir (ATV/r) and efavirenz (EFV) are both recommended as fi...
Objective: To determine the durability over 96 weeks of safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir (...
International audienceBackground:Sparing of antiretroviral drug classes could reduce the toxicity an...
Background. Current clinical guidelines consider regimens consisting of either ritonavir-boosted ata...
Background: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of ritonavir boosted atazanavir ...
Background: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of ritonavir boosted atazanavir ...
Background: Although efavirenz (EFV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) are both recommended antiretrov...
BACKGROUND: Although efavirenz (EFV) and lopinavir/ ritonavir (LPV/r) are both recommended antiretro...
BACKGROUND: Although efavirenz (EFV) and lopinavir/ ritonavir (LPV/r) are both recommended antiretro...
Objective: To compare regimens consisting of either ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or efavirenz and a ...
BACKGROUND: Current clinical guidelines consider regimens consisting of either ritonavir-boosted ata...
BACKGROUND: Current clinical guidelines consider regimens consisting of either ritonavir-boosted ata...
Current clinical guidelines consider regimens consisting of either ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or r...
BACKGROUND: Atazanavir boosted with ritonavir (ATV/r) and efavirenz (EFV) are both recommended as fi...
Background: Atazanavir boosted with ritonavir (ATV/r) and efavirenz (EFV) are both recommended as fi...
Objective: To determine the durability over 96 weeks of safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir (...
International audienceBackground:Sparing of antiretroviral drug classes could reduce the toxicity an...
Background. Current clinical guidelines consider regimens consisting of either ritonavir-boosted ata...