Shakespeare’s Henry V and Richard III both practise mendacity, but while Henry V celebrates Henry’s capacity for deceit, the king’s lies are condemned in Richard III. The plays show how similar patterns of behaviour in early modern England could be represented as either virtuous or evil by means of rhetoric, while the similar behaviour of the two kings suggests a broad awareness of the necessity of deceit as a political skill. These two plays also draw attention to their own rhetorical distortions in ways which have appeared troubling to many modern critics, but which exemplify humanist ideas about education through rhetorical ‘lies’
Plots. Hidden motives. Subtlety, falseness, treachery: Richard III, Wolsey—each of these leaders ...
This essay examines early modern notions of ideal and problematic leadership through the lens of Sha...
Ancient and early modern Europe conceptualized rhetoric as a means for speakers to control their lis...
William Shakespeare's Richard III has been the victim of a gross crime: For four hundred years, he h...
Shakespearean charisma, with its medieval roots in both religion and politics, served as a precursor...
In this study Richard III\u27s character, motivations, and his path to the throne were examined as t...
Shakespearean charisma, with its medieval roots in both religion and politics, served as a precursor...
William Shakespeare's plays, Richard II, 1 and 2 Henry IV and Henry V, form a tetralogy in which the...
Shakespearean charisma, with its medieval roots in both religion and politics, served as a precursor...
This paper is one attempt to analyse the structure of Shakespeare\u27s History Richard III and to co...
The early modern period in England produced a great number of plays dealing with history. Chronicles...
In tracing the development of Shakespeare\u27s history plays, the recurring problem of legitimacy is...
The aim of this paper is to delineate the representation of kingship in Tudor and Stuart England and...
Recent scholarship has explored the “Machiavellian” actions of Prince Hal in Henry IV, Part 1 ; yet ...
In the Modern era, an intense reverence for William Shakespeare and his works-a condition sometimes ...
Plots. Hidden motives. Subtlety, falseness, treachery: Richard III, Wolsey—each of these leaders ...
This essay examines early modern notions of ideal and problematic leadership through the lens of Sha...
Ancient and early modern Europe conceptualized rhetoric as a means for speakers to control their lis...
William Shakespeare's Richard III has been the victim of a gross crime: For four hundred years, he h...
Shakespearean charisma, with its medieval roots in both religion and politics, served as a precursor...
In this study Richard III\u27s character, motivations, and his path to the throne were examined as t...
Shakespearean charisma, with its medieval roots in both religion and politics, served as a precursor...
William Shakespeare's plays, Richard II, 1 and 2 Henry IV and Henry V, form a tetralogy in which the...
Shakespearean charisma, with its medieval roots in both religion and politics, served as a precursor...
This paper is one attempt to analyse the structure of Shakespeare\u27s History Richard III and to co...
The early modern period in England produced a great number of plays dealing with history. Chronicles...
In tracing the development of Shakespeare\u27s history plays, the recurring problem of legitimacy is...
The aim of this paper is to delineate the representation of kingship in Tudor and Stuart England and...
Recent scholarship has explored the “Machiavellian” actions of Prince Hal in Henry IV, Part 1 ; yet ...
In the Modern era, an intense reverence for William Shakespeare and his works-a condition sometimes ...
Plots. Hidden motives. Subtlety, falseness, treachery: Richard III, Wolsey—each of these leaders ...
This essay examines early modern notions of ideal and problematic leadership through the lens of Sha...
Ancient and early modern Europe conceptualized rhetoric as a means for speakers to control their lis...