Antimicrobial activity of hydroalcoholic extracts of propolis brown, green and jataí bees (Tetragonisca angustula) against infectious microorganisms of interest in Veterinary Medicine and Human

The objective of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity (antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral), cell toxicity and chemical composition of hydroalcoholic extracts of brown propolis (PM), green (PV) and native bees jataí (PJ). The antibacterial activity of propolis was analyzed by microdilution method against the Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus uberis, Streptococcus agalactiae and Escherichia coli. For the antifungal activity, similar methodology was used, compared to Candida lipolytica, Candida parapsilosis, Sporothrix schenckii and Sporothrix brasiliensis. The antiviral activity was measured using two different methods of treatment of the cells with the extracts: before and after the viral inoculation against Bovine Herpes virus (bovine herpesvirus type 1) and Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV) and quantitated by assaying MTT (3- (4,5 dimethylthiazol-2yl) - 2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolato bromine) and virucidal activity, measured using different dilutions of virus, temperatures and incubation times and analyzed by microscopic observation and quantified by the infective dose (ID) 50%. Toxicity was evaluated using different concentrations and cell viability measured by MTT. In the chemical composition of propolis was determined by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) methods. The results demonstrated that the antibacterial activity had lower values PM Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) when tested against S. aureus (6.7 mg/mL; 13.4 mg/mL, respectively) and E. coli (29.4 mg/mL, 54.3 mg/mL) compared to the PV and PJ. However front Streptococcus sp., the lowest values of MIC and MBC were found of PV (p <0.01). In the antifungal activity PM, PV and PJ showed efficacy to Candida sp. and Sporotrix spp. The PJ showed lower toxicity in PV and PM sequence. In the antiviral activity, the extracts were more effective when added in the pre treatment and the PM and PV were more effective in BoHV-1, while the PJ to BVDV. In virucidal, PV obtained at 37°C and under different values (log = 2.67) compared to PM (log = 3.5) and PJ (log = 3.76). However, for BVDV PJ showed the best results for both temperatures. Results show the potential of propolis as an antimicrobial in the treatment of diseases in Veterinary Medicine and Human.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESO objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a atividade antimicrobiana (antibacteriana, antifúngica e antiviral), toxicidade celular e composição química de extratos hidroalcoólicos da própolis marrom (PM), verde (PV) e de abelhas nativas jataí (PJ). A atividade antibacteriana da própolis foi analisada pelo método de Microdiluição frente à Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus uberis, Streptococcus agalactiae e Escherichia coli. Para a atividade antifúngica, foi utilizada metodologia semelhante, frente à Candida lipolytica, Candida parapsilosis, Sporothrix schenckii e Sporothrix brasiliensis. A atividade antiviral foi avaliada através de dois métodos distintos de tratamento das células com os extratos: antes e depois da inoculação viral, frente ao Herpes Vírus Bovino (BoHV-1) e ao Vírus da Diarreia Viral Bovina (BVDV) e quantificado pelo teste de MTT (3-(4,5 dimetiltiazol-2yl)- 2-5-difenil-2H tetrazolato de bromo) e a atividade virucida, avaliada através de diferentes diluições dos vírus, temperaturas e tempos de incubações e analisadas por observação microscópica e quantificadas através da Dose Infectante (D.I.) 50%. A toxicidade foi avaliada através de diferentes concentrações e a viabilidade celular quantificada por MTT. À composição química das própolis foi determinada por Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Eficiência (CLAE). Os resultados da atividade antibacteriana demonstraram que PM obteve valores menores de Concentração Inibitória Mínima (CIM) e Concentração Bactericida Mínima (CBM), quando testados frente à S. aureus (6,7 mg/mL; 13,4 mg/mL, respectivamente), e E. coli (29,4 mg/mL; 54,3 mg/mL) quando comparados ao PV e PJ. Contudo frente Streptococcus sp., os menores valores de CIM e CBM encontrados foram da PV (p