This Article examines whether attorneys should be allowed to testify as legal experts, especially in the legal malpractice context. This Article starts by addressing the unclear distinction between questions of law and fact and reviews several recent cases that prohibited expert legal testimony. Next, this Article addresses some general exceptions to the prohibition against expert legal testimony, such as questions of complex and uncertain law. Finally, this Article examines the use of legal experts in legal malpractice cases
The first part of the Article analyzes the client\u27s direct communications with the expert, acknow...
With regard to criminal cases, the focus of this Article, judges face significant challenges in ruli...
In every state, the professional rules of conduct contain a prohibition on an attorney acting as bot...
This Article examines whether attorneys should be allowed to testify as legal experts, especially ...
This Article examines whether attorneys should be allowed to testify as legal experts, especially in...
Attorney-experts in legal malpractice litigation are like many other experts. Although easily dist...
Attorney-experts in legal malpractice litigation are like many other experts. Although easily distin...
Trial lawyers are frequently in need of professionals to testify as experts in matters that are in l...
Expert testimony is indispensable to the uniquely American system of adversary justice. Without the ...
A lawyer charged with a disciplinary violation is in a precarious position. Not only has the lawyer ...
This Article investigates the role of expert testimony in legal malpractice and medical malpractice ...
Defendants regularly argue that a Review Board\u27s decision must be overturned because it is not su...
This Article explores how constraints operate to impair the use of expert services by privatey retai...
In legal malpractice cases, parties almost always end up using expert witnesses. Whether a particula...
In the language of the Federal Rules of Evidence, an expert is one who possesses scientific, techni...
The first part of the Article analyzes the client\u27s direct communications with the expert, acknow...
With regard to criminal cases, the focus of this Article, judges face significant challenges in ruli...
In every state, the professional rules of conduct contain a prohibition on an attorney acting as bot...
This Article examines whether attorneys should be allowed to testify as legal experts, especially ...
This Article examines whether attorneys should be allowed to testify as legal experts, especially in...
Attorney-experts in legal malpractice litigation are like many other experts. Although easily dist...
Attorney-experts in legal malpractice litigation are like many other experts. Although easily distin...
Trial lawyers are frequently in need of professionals to testify as experts in matters that are in l...
Expert testimony is indispensable to the uniquely American system of adversary justice. Without the ...
A lawyer charged with a disciplinary violation is in a precarious position. Not only has the lawyer ...
This Article investigates the role of expert testimony in legal malpractice and medical malpractice ...
Defendants regularly argue that a Review Board\u27s decision must be overturned because it is not su...
This Article explores how constraints operate to impair the use of expert services by privatey retai...
In legal malpractice cases, parties almost always end up using expert witnesses. Whether a particula...
In the language of the Federal Rules of Evidence, an expert is one who possesses scientific, techni...
The first part of the Article analyzes the client\u27s direct communications with the expert, acknow...
With regard to criminal cases, the focus of this Article, judges face significant challenges in ruli...
In every state, the professional rules of conduct contain a prohibition on an attorney acting as bot...