A group of young-adult (aged 18–35 years) and older-adult witnesses (aged 61–83 years) viewed films of two similar staged thefts, one that depicted a young culprit and the other an older culprit. After a short delay of 40–60 minutes participants were presented with two separate video line-ups, one for each target. In one line-up the target was present (TP) and the other the target was absent (TA). Older adults performed more poorly in target present and absent line-ups, and showed no own-age bias, however young adults showed an own age advantage for the TA line-ups
Young adult participants are faster to detect young adult faces in crowds of infant and child faces ...
Studies examining own-age recognition biases report inconsistent results and often utilize paradigms...
Children from 5 to 12 years of age (N = 779) were shown a videotape where a preschool teacher has mo...
The present study investigated whether child (six–eight years of age) and adult witnesses (18–29 yea...
Older adults (60- to 99-year-olds) and younger adults (18- to 49-year-olds) viewed a videotaped thef...
The identification performance of children (5 to 6 years, n = 180; 9- to 10- years, n = 180) and adu...
Previous research indicates that the age of the witness making an identification affects accuracy. F...
Criminal suspects with distinctive facial features, such as tattoos or bruising, may stand out in a ...
Middle-aged and older adults are frequently victims and witnesses of crime, but knowledge of how ide...
We tested developmental trends in eyewitness identification in biased and unbiased lineups. Our main...
In the UK video parades are the preferred method of identification employed in criminal cases. This ...
The ability to accurately identify a face is critical for eyewitnesses. Police and juries\ud rely on...
The main aim of this thesis was to increase understanding of the decision processes and strategies u...
The own-age bias (OAB) refers to recognition memory being more accurate for people of our own age th...
Recent investigations into the effect of age on face identification concluded that it was more diffi...
Young adult participants are faster to detect young adult faces in crowds of infant and child faces ...
Studies examining own-age recognition biases report inconsistent results and often utilize paradigms...
Children from 5 to 12 years of age (N = 779) were shown a videotape where a preschool teacher has mo...
The present study investigated whether child (six–eight years of age) and adult witnesses (18–29 yea...
Older adults (60- to 99-year-olds) and younger adults (18- to 49-year-olds) viewed a videotaped thef...
The identification performance of children (5 to 6 years, n = 180; 9- to 10- years, n = 180) and adu...
Previous research indicates that the age of the witness making an identification affects accuracy. F...
Criminal suspects with distinctive facial features, such as tattoos or bruising, may stand out in a ...
Middle-aged and older adults are frequently victims and witnesses of crime, but knowledge of how ide...
We tested developmental trends in eyewitness identification in biased and unbiased lineups. Our main...
In the UK video parades are the preferred method of identification employed in criminal cases. This ...
The ability to accurately identify a face is critical for eyewitnesses. Police and juries\ud rely on...
The main aim of this thesis was to increase understanding of the decision processes and strategies u...
The own-age bias (OAB) refers to recognition memory being more accurate for people of our own age th...
Recent investigations into the effect of age on face identification concluded that it was more diffi...
Young adult participants are faster to detect young adult faces in crowds of infant and child faces ...
Studies examining own-age recognition biases report inconsistent results and often utilize paradigms...
Children from 5 to 12 years of age (N = 779) were shown a videotape where a preschool teacher has mo...