Many states use a classificatory approach to foreign policy: they put other states into particular categories and structure their engagement and relations partly as a result. There is one prominent modern international political theory – Rawls’ Law of Peoples – that seems to adopt this approach as an account of justified state behaviour. But should we expect this type of theory ultimately to prove attractive, justified and philosophically distinct compared to more instrumentalist rivals? This paper explores the challenges generic to any such account, not merely those relating to Rawls’ specific version, and surveys possible responses and their shortcomings
This thesis makes an original contribution to the field of de facto state studies. The robustne...
It is generally accepted that jus cogens norms are recognised to be non-derogable, and to bind all S...
Regime design choices in international law turn on empirical claims about how states behave and unde...
Many states use a classificatory approach to foreign policy: they put other states into particular c...
Many states use a classificatory approach to foreign policy: they put other states into particular c...
International law scholars debate when international law matters to states, how it matters, and whet...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2014States tend to be the centerpiece of International Rel...
It is generally held that states interact with one another in a state of anarchy, at least when it c...
This Essay advances an argument for rethinking the current terms of engagement of U.S. foreign polic...
This paper is a multidisciplinary study of two competing theories of states’ motives and behavior in...
The idea of a responsible cosmopolitan state (RCS) represents a recent attempt to reconcile the utop...
The Oxford Handbook of International Legal Theory provides an accessible and authoritative guide to ...
The tension between the authority of states and the authority of international institutions is a per...
focus of this paper is on the ethics of international state-building in deeply divided postwar socie...
In Justifying International Acts, Professor Lea Brilmayer offers a theory of international relations...
This thesis makes an original contribution to the field of de facto state studies. The robustne...
It is generally accepted that jus cogens norms are recognised to be non-derogable, and to bind all S...
Regime design choices in international law turn on empirical claims about how states behave and unde...
Many states use a classificatory approach to foreign policy: they put other states into particular c...
Many states use a classificatory approach to foreign policy: they put other states into particular c...
International law scholars debate when international law matters to states, how it matters, and whet...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2014States tend to be the centerpiece of International Rel...
It is generally held that states interact with one another in a state of anarchy, at least when it c...
This Essay advances an argument for rethinking the current terms of engagement of U.S. foreign polic...
This paper is a multidisciplinary study of two competing theories of states’ motives and behavior in...
The idea of a responsible cosmopolitan state (RCS) represents a recent attempt to reconcile the utop...
The Oxford Handbook of International Legal Theory provides an accessible and authoritative guide to ...
The tension between the authority of states and the authority of international institutions is a per...
focus of this paper is on the ethics of international state-building in deeply divided postwar socie...
In Justifying International Acts, Professor Lea Brilmayer offers a theory of international relations...
This thesis makes an original contribution to the field of de facto state studies. The robustne...
It is generally accepted that jus cogens norms are recognised to be non-derogable, and to bind all S...
Regime design choices in international law turn on empirical claims about how states behave and unde...