A standard approach to the combination of probabilistic opinions involves taking a weighted linear average of the individuals distributions. This paper reviews some of the possible interpretations that have been proposed for these weights in the literature on expert use. Several paradigms for selecting weights are also considered. Special attention is devoted to the Bayesian mechanism used for updating expert weights in the face of new information. An asymptotic result is proved which highlights the importance of choosing the initial weights carefully
I enjoyed this paper, though disagreeing with its theory. For years I have tried to understand the B...
This paper describes a method for choosing a natural conjugate prior distribution for a normal linea...
In risky situations characterized by imminent decisions, scarce resources, and insufficient data, po...
Consider a decision problem involving a group of m Bayesians in which each member reports his/her po...
Suppose several individuals (e.g., experts on a panel) each assign probabilities to some events. How...
A new model for dealing with decision making under risk by considering subjective and objective info...
Moment methods have been employed in decision analysis, partly to avoid the computational burden tha...
We address the task of choosing prior weights for models that are to be used for weighted model aver...
The proportional weight view in epistemology of disagreement generalizes the equal weight view and p...
The use of expert knowledge to quantify a Bayesian Network (BN) is necessary when data is not availa...
In this contribution we focus on the finite collection of sources, providing their opinions about a ...
Expert opinion and judgment enter into the practice of statistical inference and decision-making in ...
In a group decision making setting, we consider the po-tential impact an expert can have on the over...
In this paper, we describe a relation between classification systems and information transmission sy...
[[abstract]]Many decision making problems of business and management are formulated in terms of Mult...
I enjoyed this paper, though disagreeing with its theory. For years I have tried to understand the B...
This paper describes a method for choosing a natural conjugate prior distribution for a normal linea...
In risky situations characterized by imminent decisions, scarce resources, and insufficient data, po...
Consider a decision problem involving a group of m Bayesians in which each member reports his/her po...
Suppose several individuals (e.g., experts on a panel) each assign probabilities to some events. How...
A new model for dealing with decision making under risk by considering subjective and objective info...
Moment methods have been employed in decision analysis, partly to avoid the computational burden tha...
We address the task of choosing prior weights for models that are to be used for weighted model aver...
The proportional weight view in epistemology of disagreement generalizes the equal weight view and p...
The use of expert knowledge to quantify a Bayesian Network (BN) is necessary when data is not availa...
In this contribution we focus on the finite collection of sources, providing their opinions about a ...
Expert opinion and judgment enter into the practice of statistical inference and decision-making in ...
In a group decision making setting, we consider the po-tential impact an expert can have on the over...
In this paper, we describe a relation between classification systems and information transmission sy...
[[abstract]]Many decision making problems of business and management are formulated in terms of Mult...
I enjoyed this paper, though disagreeing with its theory. For years I have tried to understand the B...
This paper describes a method for choosing a natural conjugate prior distribution for a normal linea...
In risky situations characterized by imminent decisions, scarce resources, and insufficient data, po...