One of the staples of journalism is the straw man: the threat that never existed or the claim that was never really made. With the Internet this straw man is Joe Trippi and the few other people who have insisted that the Internet is innately democratic and that it will have revolutionary political consequences. Matthew Hindman’s The Myth of Digital Democracy has them in its sights. It is essential reading for anyone concerned about democracy and the Web
This article responds to current critiques about the myths of digital democracy drawing on the case ...
This paper seeks to establish a set of concepts to help frame an empirical analysis of the relations...
Version 3.2. Originally published on blog and wiki and then as a chapter in the book, Extreme Democr...
As a political tool the internet is neither ?top down? nor ?bottom up,? argues Mark Bahnisch in this...
We have all got to stop believing in the Monkey Myth of the Internet and Democracy, according to Evg...
Late in 2006 The Guardian ran a special feature in its weekend magazine on ‘the second Internet gol...
The debate over the contribution of the Internet to democracy is farfrom settled. Some point to the ...
As democracy encounters increasing difficulties, many citizens are turning to the domain of alternat...
This is a particularly interesting time for internet scholars and activists because we are near the ...
“If it turns out that the Internet does help to stifle dissent, amplify existing inequalities in ter...
Instead of asking what is so wrong with our political communications today, why not ask, ‘what is wo...
In the last two decades, the internet has become a site for political power to be gained, lost, and ...
Book synopsis: Web Journalism: A New Form of Citizenship provides a much-needed analytical account o...
Since its invention, the internet has been considered a ‘game-changer’ when it comes to democracy, w...
I’m not going, but the PersonalDemocracy conference in New York looks more interesting than ever. A ...
This article responds to current critiques about the myths of digital democracy drawing on the case ...
This paper seeks to establish a set of concepts to help frame an empirical analysis of the relations...
Version 3.2. Originally published on blog and wiki and then as a chapter in the book, Extreme Democr...
As a political tool the internet is neither ?top down? nor ?bottom up,? argues Mark Bahnisch in this...
We have all got to stop believing in the Monkey Myth of the Internet and Democracy, according to Evg...
Late in 2006 The Guardian ran a special feature in its weekend magazine on ‘the second Internet gol...
The debate over the contribution of the Internet to democracy is farfrom settled. Some point to the ...
As democracy encounters increasing difficulties, many citizens are turning to the domain of alternat...
This is a particularly interesting time for internet scholars and activists because we are near the ...
“If it turns out that the Internet does help to stifle dissent, amplify existing inequalities in ter...
Instead of asking what is so wrong with our political communications today, why not ask, ‘what is wo...
In the last two decades, the internet has become a site for political power to be gained, lost, and ...
Book synopsis: Web Journalism: A New Form of Citizenship provides a much-needed analytical account o...
Since its invention, the internet has been considered a ‘game-changer’ when it comes to democracy, w...
I’m not going, but the PersonalDemocracy conference in New York looks more interesting than ever. A ...
This article responds to current critiques about the myths of digital democracy drawing on the case ...
This paper seeks to establish a set of concepts to help frame an empirical analysis of the relations...
Version 3.2. Originally published on blog and wiki and then as a chapter in the book, Extreme Democr...