This article explores the case for excluding all prisoners from the electorate, and argues that the European Court of Human Rights was justified in ruling that the UK had been in breach of human rights law when disenfranchising virtually all convicted prisoners irrespective of their crime
In 2005 the ECtHR ruled that the UK was in breach of Art. 3 of Protocol 1 (Hirst v. The United Kingd...
This paper considers the justifiability of removing the right to vote from those convicted of crimes...
Drawing on and combining political science and legal frameworks, this article explores the validity ...
This article looks at voting rights for sentenced prisoners in the UK. A number of approaches are ad...
This article explores and critiques the rationales for disenfranchising prisoners advanced by politi...
In Hirst v UK, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the UK must end its blanket ban on conv...
In Hirst v UK, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the UK must end its blanket ban on conv...
In Hirst v UK, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the UK must end its blanket ban on conv...
The article begins by locating human rights law within the current political context before moving o...
Copyright © 2009 NAPOThis article considers the issue of the prisoner’s right to vote in the light o...
<p>This article provides a critical appraisal of the law on prisons since the introduction of the Hu...
This Comment examines European disenfranchisement of prisoners in light of the European Convention o...
This Comment examines European disenfranchisement of prisoners in light of the European Convention o...
Do prisoners’ rights matter? This paper examines this question through a social-legal study of one o...
Following the decision of the ECtHR in Hirst v UK, (Application no. 74025/01) the government indicat...
In 2005 the ECtHR ruled that the UK was in breach of Art. 3 of Protocol 1 (Hirst v. The United Kingd...
This paper considers the justifiability of removing the right to vote from those convicted of crimes...
Drawing on and combining political science and legal frameworks, this article explores the validity ...
This article looks at voting rights for sentenced prisoners in the UK. A number of approaches are ad...
This article explores and critiques the rationales for disenfranchising prisoners advanced by politi...
In Hirst v UK, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the UK must end its blanket ban on conv...
In Hirst v UK, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the UK must end its blanket ban on conv...
In Hirst v UK, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the UK must end its blanket ban on conv...
The article begins by locating human rights law within the current political context before moving o...
Copyright © 2009 NAPOThis article considers the issue of the prisoner’s right to vote in the light o...
<p>This article provides a critical appraisal of the law on prisons since the introduction of the Hu...
This Comment examines European disenfranchisement of prisoners in light of the European Convention o...
This Comment examines European disenfranchisement of prisoners in light of the European Convention o...
Do prisoners’ rights matter? This paper examines this question through a social-legal study of one o...
Following the decision of the ECtHR in Hirst v UK, (Application no. 74025/01) the government indicat...
In 2005 the ECtHR ruled that the UK was in breach of Art. 3 of Protocol 1 (Hirst v. The United Kingd...
This paper considers the justifiability of removing the right to vote from those convicted of crimes...
Drawing on and combining political science and legal frameworks, this article explores the validity ...
DOI
Add to ORKG