Fistula dysfunction: Effect on rapid hemodialysis

Fistula dysfunction: Effect on rapid hemodialysis. Rapid hemodialysis (Qb 400 to 500ml/min) places considerable demands on hemodialysis vascular access. This six-month prospective study enrolled 52 patients and evaluated urea recirculation as a means of detecting fistula dysfunction. It evaluated the effects of fistula location and dialysis blood flow on urea recirculation during rapid hemodialysis and assessed the effect of rapid dialysis on fistula thrombosis. Urea recirculation increased as Qb increased from 300 to 400ml/min (8 ± 3% to 16 ± 3%, P < 0.05). The extent ofurea recirculation was also fistula site dependent (radial fistulas 18 ± 4%, upper arm fistulas 11 ± 3%, Qb 400ml/min, P < 0.05). Site and blood flow dependent urea recirculations were an indicator of venous stenoses. When venous stenoses were corrected, urea recirculation rates improved (36 ± 3% to 21 ± 3%, P < 0.05). There were no differences between methods of determining urea recirculation early in dialysis (contralateral arm venepuncture vs. stop flow technique; 30 to 60 mm). However, at 120 minutes urea recircu lation was significantly greater with the contralateral arm venepuncture technique, Venous dialysis pressure at Qb 400ml/min had limited use as a predictor of venous stenoses unlike its value at lower Qb. Fistula thrombosis (0.26/patient year of dialysis) and fistula replacement (0.09/ patient year of dialysis) were similar to our observations in a conventional hemodialysis facility where prospective correction of fistula dysfunction was also used