The complexity of approximating MAPs for belief networks with bounded probabilities

AbstractProbabilistic inference and maximum a posteriori (MAP) explanation are two important and related problems on Bayesian belief networks. Both problems are known to be NP-hard for both approximation and exact solution. In 1997, Dagum and Luby showed that efficiently approximating probabilistic inference is possible for belief networks in which all probabilities are bounded away from 0. In this paper, we show that the corresponding result for MAP explanation does not hold: finding, or approximating, MAPs for belief networks remains NP-hard for belief networks with probabilities bounded within the range [l,u] for any 0⩽l<0.5