AbstractBy applying descriptive set theory to the Wagner's fine structure of regular ω-languages we get quite different proofs of his results and obtain new results. We give an automata-free description of the fine structure. We present also a simple property of a deterministic Muller automaton equivalent to the condition that the corresponding regular ω-language belongs to any given level of the fine structure. Our results and proofs demonstrate deep interconnections between descriptive set theory and the theory of ω-languages
A combinatorial lemma is proved and used here to derive new results on ω-automata and to give simple...
AbstractIn “On regularity of context-free languages” [Theoret. Comput. Sci. 27 (1983) 311], Ehrenfeu...
ω-languages are sets consisting of ω-length strings; ω-automata are recognition devicesfor ω-languag...
AbstractBy applying descriptive set theory to the Wagner's fine structure of regular ω-languages we ...
AbstractFor a given ω-regular language A we establish an invariant property of the structure of fini...
AbstractFirst-order formulas are used to specify various ways of acceptance of ω-languages by (deter...
AbstractThis paper is a continuation of the work by Landweber [5], to clarify the relationship betwe...
AbstractGiven a finite alphabet Σ, we give a simple characterization of those Gδ subsets of Σω which...
AbstractIn this paper, we give language-theoretical representations for some classes of ω- languages...
We establish a Myhill-Nerode type theorem for higher-dimensional automata (HDAs), stating that a lan...
AbstractG-machines are considered as generators of sets of finite and infinite sequences, called G-l...
Abstract(I) Wadge defined a natural refinement of the Borel hierarchy, now called the Wadge hierarch...
We investigate the separation problem for regular ?-languages with respect to the Wagner hierarchy w...
I) Wadge defined a natural refinement of the Borel hierarchy, now called the Wadge hierarchy WH. The...
AbstractTwenty years ago, Klaus. W. Wagner came up with a hierarchy of ω-regular sets that actually ...
A combinatorial lemma is proved and used here to derive new results on ω-automata and to give simple...
AbstractIn “On regularity of context-free languages” [Theoret. Comput. Sci. 27 (1983) 311], Ehrenfeu...
ω-languages are sets consisting of ω-length strings; ω-automata are recognition devicesfor ω-languag...
AbstractBy applying descriptive set theory to the Wagner's fine structure of regular ω-languages we ...
AbstractFor a given ω-regular language A we establish an invariant property of the structure of fini...
AbstractFirst-order formulas are used to specify various ways of acceptance of ω-languages by (deter...
AbstractThis paper is a continuation of the work by Landweber [5], to clarify the relationship betwe...
AbstractGiven a finite alphabet Σ, we give a simple characterization of those Gδ subsets of Σω which...
AbstractIn this paper, we give language-theoretical representations for some classes of ω- languages...
We establish a Myhill-Nerode type theorem for higher-dimensional automata (HDAs), stating that a lan...
AbstractG-machines are considered as generators of sets of finite and infinite sequences, called G-l...
Abstract(I) Wadge defined a natural refinement of the Borel hierarchy, now called the Wadge hierarch...
We investigate the separation problem for regular ?-languages with respect to the Wagner hierarchy w...
I) Wadge defined a natural refinement of the Borel hierarchy, now called the Wadge hierarchy WH. The...
AbstractTwenty years ago, Klaus. W. Wagner came up with a hierarchy of ω-regular sets that actually ...
A combinatorial lemma is proved and used here to derive new results on ω-automata and to give simple...
AbstractIn “On regularity of context-free languages” [Theoret. Comput. Sci. 27 (1983) 311], Ehrenfeu...
ω-languages are sets consisting of ω-length strings; ω-automata are recognition devicesfor ω-languag...