AbstractOverwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal. Without transparent reporting, readers cannot judge the reliability and validity of trial findings nor extract information for systematic reviews. Recent methodological analyses indicate that inadequate reporting and design are associated with biased estimates of treatment effects. Such systematic error is seriously damaging to RCTs, which are considered the gold standard for evaluating interventions because of their ability to minimise or avoid bias.A group of scientists and editors developed the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to improve the quality of reporting of RCTs. It was first published ...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (...
Evidence shows that the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal. ...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of report-ing of randomized, controlled trials ...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
AbstractOverwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ...
AbstractOverwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
To comprehend the results of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design...
To comprehend the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (...
Evidence shows that the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal. ...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of report-ing of randomized, controlled trials ...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
AbstractOverwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ...
AbstractOverwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
To comprehend the results of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design...
To comprehend the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (...
Evidence shows that the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal. ...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of report-ing of randomized, controlled trials ...