AbstractWe show that for Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (without weakenings) the syntactical equivalence relation on proofs induced by cut-elimination coincides with the semantic equivalence relation on proofs induced by the multiset based relational model: one says that the interpretation in the model (or the semantics) is injective. We actually prove a stronger result: two cut-free proofs of the full multiplicative and exponential fragment of linear logic whose interpretations coincide in the multiset based relational model are the same “up to the connections between the doors of exponential boxes”
Proof equivalence in a logic is the problem of deciding whether two proofs are equivalent modulo a s...
We associate to every proof structure in multiplicative linear logic an ideal which represents the l...
Given a logic presented in a sequent calculus, a natural question is that ofequivalence of proofs: t...
We show that for a suitable fragment of linear logic the syntactical equivalence relation on proofs ...
AbstractWe show that for Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (without weakenings) the syntactica...
We prove a completeness result for Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (MELL): we show that the ...
International audienceWe show that every connected Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) pr...
We show that every connected Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-structure (with or...
Each Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-net can be expandedinto a differential net...
International audienceWe show that: (1) the Taylor expansion of a cut-free MELL proof-structure R wi...
AbstractWe show that the extensional collapse of the relational model of linear logic is the model o...
We examine some combinatorial properties of parallel cut elimination in multiplicative linear logic ...
http://www.lmcs-online.orgInternational audienceIn the first part of this paper we present a theory ...
We study full completeness and syntactical separability of MLL proof nets with the mix rule. The gen...
Commuting conversions of Linear Logic induce a notion of dependencybetween rules inside a proof deri...
Proof equivalence in a logic is the problem of deciding whether two proofs are equivalent modulo a s...
We associate to every proof structure in multiplicative linear logic an ideal which represents the l...
Given a logic presented in a sequent calculus, a natural question is that ofequivalence of proofs: t...
We show that for a suitable fragment of linear logic the syntactical equivalence relation on proofs ...
AbstractWe show that for Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (without weakenings) the syntactica...
We prove a completeness result for Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (MELL): we show that the ...
International audienceWe show that every connected Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) pr...
We show that every connected Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-structure (with or...
Each Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-net can be expandedinto a differential net...
International audienceWe show that: (1) the Taylor expansion of a cut-free MELL proof-structure R wi...
AbstractWe show that the extensional collapse of the relational model of linear logic is the model o...
We examine some combinatorial properties of parallel cut elimination in multiplicative linear logic ...
http://www.lmcs-online.orgInternational audienceIn the first part of this paper we present a theory ...
We study full completeness and syntactical separability of MLL proof nets with the mix rule. The gen...
Commuting conversions of Linear Logic induce a notion of dependencybetween rules inside a proof deri...
Proof equivalence in a logic is the problem of deciding whether two proofs are equivalent modulo a s...
We associate to every proof structure in multiplicative linear logic an ideal which represents the l...
Given a logic presented in a sequent calculus, a natural question is that ofequivalence of proofs: t...