The recent paper by Refshauge et al, together with the response by Jull et al and Refshauge et al's response to Jull et al, each published in the same issue of the Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, identify and debate important issues for not only the physiotherapy profession but also the community at large
Purpose: Debate surrounds cervical arterial dysfunction (CAD) & the risk of catastrophic events asso...
It was with considerable interest, and some concern, that I read Martin Van Der Weyden's editorial “...
I congratulate and express appreciation to Mann and Refshauge for their comprehensive analysis of th...
The recent paper by Refshauge et al, together with the response by Jull et al and Refshauge et al's ...
I refer to the Refshauge et al paper and associated responses in the last issue of the Australian Jo...
Joining the discussion on whether our profession is meeting its full responsibilities to provide opt...
It is timely that the physiotherapy profession debates the use of cervical manipulation, so I read w...
Results from recent randomised controlled trials conducted by physiotherapists are contributing to t...
Manipulation of the cervical spine is one of the few potentially life-threatening procedures perform...
We applaud Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy Australia for the formulation of the new Pre-Manipulative g...
I would like to advise readers of the Australian Journal of Physiotherapy that the Clinical Guidelin...
This issue of the Journal includes a new feature: the ‘AJP Forum’. The Editorial Board envisages tha...
The MPA undertook a survey of its members in 1997 to determine their compliance with and opinion of ...
It is an exciting but challenging era when physiotherapy has matured to the point where we are able ...
The Australian Physiotherapy Association 2006 VBI Guidelines are used by many of the member organisa...
Purpose: Debate surrounds cervical arterial dysfunction (CAD) & the risk of catastrophic events asso...
It was with considerable interest, and some concern, that I read Martin Van Der Weyden's editorial “...
I congratulate and express appreciation to Mann and Refshauge for their comprehensive analysis of th...
The recent paper by Refshauge et al, together with the response by Jull et al and Refshauge et al's ...
I refer to the Refshauge et al paper and associated responses in the last issue of the Australian Jo...
Joining the discussion on whether our profession is meeting its full responsibilities to provide opt...
It is timely that the physiotherapy profession debates the use of cervical manipulation, so I read w...
Results from recent randomised controlled trials conducted by physiotherapists are contributing to t...
Manipulation of the cervical spine is one of the few potentially life-threatening procedures perform...
We applaud Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy Australia for the formulation of the new Pre-Manipulative g...
I would like to advise readers of the Australian Journal of Physiotherapy that the Clinical Guidelin...
This issue of the Journal includes a new feature: the ‘AJP Forum’. The Editorial Board envisages tha...
The MPA undertook a survey of its members in 1997 to determine their compliance with and opinion of ...
It is an exciting but challenging era when physiotherapy has matured to the point where we are able ...
The Australian Physiotherapy Association 2006 VBI Guidelines are used by many of the member organisa...
Purpose: Debate surrounds cervical arterial dysfunction (CAD) & the risk of catastrophic events asso...
It was with considerable interest, and some concern, that I read Martin Van Der Weyden's editorial “...
I congratulate and express appreciation to Mann and Refshauge for their comprehensive analysis of th...