The temporal properties of first- and second-order vision

AbstractVision is sensitive to first-order modulations of luminance and second-order modulations of image contrast. There is now a body of evidence that the two types of modulation are detected by separate mechanisms. Some previous experiments on motion detection have suggested that the second-order system is quite sluggish compared to the first-order system. Here we derive temporal properties of first- and second-order vision at threshold from studies of temporal integration and two-pulse summation. Three types of modulation were tested: luminance gratings alone, luminance modulations added to dynamic visual noise, and contrast modulations of dynamic noise. Data from the two-pulse summation experiment were used to derive impulse response functions for the three types of stimulus. These were then used to predict performance in the temporal integration experiment. Temporal frequency response functions were obtained as the Fourier transform of impulse responses derived from data averaged across two observers. The response to noise-free luminance gratings of 2 c/deg was bi-phasic and transient in the time domain, and bandpass in the frequency domain. The addition of dynamic noise caused the response to become mono-phasic, sustained and low-pass. The response to contrast modulated noise (second-order) was also mono-phasic, sustained and low-pass, with only a slightly longer integration time than in the first-order case. The ultimate roll-off at high frequencies was about the same as for the first-order case. We conclude that second-order vision may not be as sluggish as previously thought