AbstractIn this paper, we solve two open problems posed by Karen L. Bernstein regarding her promoted tyft format for structured operational semantics. We show that, unlike formats with closed terms as labels, such as the tyft format, the well-foundedness assumption cannot be dropped for the promoted tyft format while preserving the congruence result. We also show that the well-founded promoted tyft format is incomparable to the tyft format with closed terms as labels, i.e., there are transition relations that can be specified by the promoted tyft format but not by the tyft format, and vice versa
e mail wancwinl Abstract Groote and Vaandrager introduced the tyfttyxt format for transition syst...
We lay the foundations for a Structural Operational Semantics (SOS) framework for higher order proce...
AbstractWhile studying the specification of the operational semantics of different programming langu...
In this paper, we solve two open problems posed by Karen L. Bernstein regarding her promoted tyft fo...
AbstractIn this paper, we solve two open problems posed by Karen L. Bernstein regarding her promoted...
AbstractIn this paper we are interested in general properties of classes of transition system specif...
AbstractGroote and Vaandrager introduced the tyft format, which is a congruence format for strong bi...
Groote and Vaandrager introduced the tyft/tyxt format for Transition System Specifications (TSSs), a...
AbstractWe define a formalism for Structural Operational Semantics (SOS) with first-order-logic form...
In this paper we describe the promoted tyft/tyxt rule format for defining higher-order languages. Th...
Structural operational semantics (SOS) [44] provides a framework to givean operational semantics to ...
In this paper the question is considered in which cases a transition system specification in Plotkin...
Groote and Vaandrager [5] introduced the tyft/tyxt format for transition system specifications (TSSs...
AbstractThis paper presents a new format for process algebras, the extended tyft/tyxt format which g...
AbstractIn 1981 Structural Operational Semantics (SOS) was introduced as a systematic way to define ...
e mail wancwinl Abstract Groote and Vaandrager introduced the tyfttyxt format for transition syst...
We lay the foundations for a Structural Operational Semantics (SOS) framework for higher order proce...
AbstractWhile studying the specification of the operational semantics of different programming langu...
In this paper, we solve two open problems posed by Karen L. Bernstein regarding her promoted tyft fo...
AbstractIn this paper, we solve two open problems posed by Karen L. Bernstein regarding her promoted...
AbstractIn this paper we are interested in general properties of classes of transition system specif...
AbstractGroote and Vaandrager introduced the tyft format, which is a congruence format for strong bi...
Groote and Vaandrager introduced the tyft/tyxt format for Transition System Specifications (TSSs), a...
AbstractWe define a formalism for Structural Operational Semantics (SOS) with first-order-logic form...
In this paper we describe the promoted tyft/tyxt rule format for defining higher-order languages. Th...
Structural operational semantics (SOS) [44] provides a framework to givean operational semantics to ...
In this paper the question is considered in which cases a transition system specification in Plotkin...
Groote and Vaandrager [5] introduced the tyft/tyxt format for transition system specifications (TSSs...
AbstractThis paper presents a new format for process algebras, the extended tyft/tyxt format which g...
AbstractIn 1981 Structural Operational Semantics (SOS) was introduced as a systematic way to define ...
e mail wancwinl Abstract Groote and Vaandrager introduced the tyfttyxt format for transition syst...
We lay the foundations for a Structural Operational Semantics (SOS) framework for higher order proce...
AbstractWhile studying the specification of the operational semantics of different programming langu...