ObjectivesThis study evaluated data from 3 federally funded trials that focused on optimal medical therapy to determine if formalized attempts at risk factor control within clinical trials are effective in achieving guideline-driven treatment goals for diabetic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).BackgroundDespite clear evidence of benefit for CAD secondary prevention, the level of risk factor control in clinical practice has been disappointing.MethodsWe obtained data from the COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) diabetes subgroup, (n = 766 of 2,287), the BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes) trial (n = 2,368), and the FREEDOM (Comparison of Two Trea...
Background: Blood pressure, lipid, and glycemic control are essential for reducing cardiovascular di...
OBJECTIVETo compare effects of combinations of standard and intensive treatment of glycemia and eith...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an intensive, multifactorial cardiovasc...
ObjectivesThis study evaluated data from 3 federally funded trials that focused on optimal medical t...
AbstractBackgroundIt is unclear whether achieving multiple risk factor (RF) goals through protocol-g...
ObjectivesThis study sought to determine the optimal coronary revascularization strategy in patients...
Aims: To document in recent cohorts the degree of control of major cardiovascular (CV) risk factors ...
ObjectivesIn a nonclinical trial setting, we sought to determine the proportion of individuals with ...
BackgroundA growing body of evidence suggests that earlier diagnosis and treatment of diabetes may b...
ObjectivesThis paper describes the medical therapy used in the COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing ...
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of new-onset diabetes (NOD) with ca...
Most patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus develop cardiovascular disease (CVD), with substantial l...
Background: The highest priority in preventive cardiology was given to patients with established co...
OBJECTIVES: To assess the mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) following percutaneous c...
Background: Blood pressure, lipid, and glycemic control are essential for reducing cardiovascular di...
OBJECTIVETo compare effects of combinations of standard and intensive treatment of glycemia and eith...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an intensive, multifactorial cardiovasc...
ObjectivesThis study evaluated data from 3 federally funded trials that focused on optimal medical t...
AbstractBackgroundIt is unclear whether achieving multiple risk factor (RF) goals through protocol-g...
ObjectivesThis study sought to determine the optimal coronary revascularization strategy in patients...
Aims: To document in recent cohorts the degree of control of major cardiovascular (CV) risk factors ...
ObjectivesIn a nonclinical trial setting, we sought to determine the proportion of individuals with ...
BackgroundA growing body of evidence suggests that earlier diagnosis and treatment of diabetes may b...
ObjectivesThis paper describes the medical therapy used in the COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing ...
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of new-onset diabetes (NOD) with ca...
Most patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus develop cardiovascular disease (CVD), with substantial l...
Background: The highest priority in preventive cardiology was given to patients with established co...
OBJECTIVES: To assess the mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) following percutaneous c...
Background: Blood pressure, lipid, and glycemic control are essential for reducing cardiovascular di...
OBJECTIVETo compare effects of combinations of standard and intensive treatment of glycemia and eith...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an intensive, multifactorial cardiovasc...