AbstractThe paper reports the result of an experimental game on asset integration and risk taking. We find some evidence that winnings in earlier rounds affect risk taking in subsequent rounds, but no evidence that real life wealth outside the experiment affects risk taking. Controlling for past winnings, participants receiving a low endowment in a round engage in more risk taking. We test a ‘keeping-up-with-the-Joneses’ hypothesis and find that subjects seek to keep up with winners, though not necessarily with average earnings. Overall, the evidence suggests that risk taking tracks a reference point affected by social comparisons
Previous research suggests that social comparisons affect decision making under uncertainty. However...
Using a high-stakes field experiment conducted with a financial brokerage, we implement a novel desi...
AbstractWe study the impact of coupling a decision maker’s lottery payoffs to those of a peer on the...
The paper reports the result of an experimental game on asset integration and risk taking. We find s...
AbstractThe paper reports the result of an experimental game on asset integration and risk taking. W...
Abstract of associated article: The paper reports the result of an experimental game on asset integr...
Using a high‐stakes field experiment conducted with a financial brokerage, we implement a novel desi...
Standard economic theory assumes that individual risk taking decisions are independent from the soci...
This paper experimentally investigates excessive risk taking in contest schemes by implementing a no...
We provide evidence that choices over small stakes bets are consistent with assumptions of some payo...
This paper examines the effect of peers on individual risk taking. In the absence of informational m...
International audienceTwo experiments examined the relationships between the knowledge that another ...
Measures of risk attitudes derived from experiments are often questioned because they are based on s...
The risky investment game of Gneezy and Potters (Q J Econ 112(2):631–645, 1997) has been proposed as...
We provide experimental evidence that social comparisons affect individual risk taking. In particula...
Previous research suggests that social comparisons affect decision making under uncertainty. However...
Using a high-stakes field experiment conducted with a financial brokerage, we implement a novel desi...
AbstractWe study the impact of coupling a decision maker’s lottery payoffs to those of a peer on the...
The paper reports the result of an experimental game on asset integration and risk taking. We find s...
AbstractThe paper reports the result of an experimental game on asset integration and risk taking. W...
Abstract of associated article: The paper reports the result of an experimental game on asset integr...
Using a high‐stakes field experiment conducted with a financial brokerage, we implement a novel desi...
Standard economic theory assumes that individual risk taking decisions are independent from the soci...
This paper experimentally investigates excessive risk taking in contest schemes by implementing a no...
We provide evidence that choices over small stakes bets are consistent with assumptions of some payo...
This paper examines the effect of peers on individual risk taking. In the absence of informational m...
International audienceTwo experiments examined the relationships between the knowledge that another ...
Measures of risk attitudes derived from experiments are often questioned because they are based on s...
The risky investment game of Gneezy and Potters (Q J Econ 112(2):631–645, 1997) has been proposed as...
We provide experimental evidence that social comparisons affect individual risk taking. In particula...
Previous research suggests that social comparisons affect decision making under uncertainty. However...
Using a high-stakes field experiment conducted with a financial brokerage, we implement a novel desi...
AbstractWe study the impact of coupling a decision maker’s lottery payoffs to those of a peer on the...