In this chapter, we provide an overview of how (Quantitative) Structure Activity Relationships, (Q)SARs, are validated and applied for regulatory purposes. We outline how chemical categories are derived to facilitate endpoint specific readacross using tools such as the OECD QSAR Toolbox and discuss some of the current difficulties in addressing the residual uncertainties of read-across. Finally we put forward a perspective of how non-testing approaches may evolve in light of the advances in new and emerging technologies and how these fit within the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework.JRC.F.3-Chemicals Safety and Alternative Method
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In order to efficiently and effectively assess the risks of large numbers of existing chemicals and ...
The aim of this chapter is to outline the different ways in which Quantitative Structure-Activity Re...
The goal here was to describe human toxicological SARs (structure-activity relationships) available ...
The ethical and economic consequences that would be incurred in the event of a systematic and experi...
National audienceQuantitative and qualitative models describing the relationship between chemical st...
This article is a review of the use of quantitative (and qualitative) structure-activity relationshi...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In order to efficiently and effectively assess the risks of large numbers of existing chemicals and ...
The aim of this chapter is to outline the different ways in which Quantitative Structure-Activity Re...
The goal here was to describe human toxicological SARs (structure-activity relationships) available ...
The ethical and economic consequences that would be incurred in the event of a systematic and experi...
National audienceQuantitative and qualitative models describing the relationship between chemical st...
This article is a review of the use of quantitative (and qualitative) structure-activity relationshi...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...
In November 2004, the OECD Member Countries and the European Commission adopted five principles for ...