Research Brief 10-01-HNP

Food insecurity limits capacity to meet the specific nutritional needs of HIV/AIDS affected people. HIV infection itself undermines food security and nutrition by reducing work capacity and productivity and jeopardizing household livelihoods. The HIV Nutrition Project’s (HNP) food intervention study funded by the GL-CRSP through USAID has the improvement of household food security through an increased intake of animal source foods as one of the core objectives. In addition to health and nutritional status assessment, the proxy measures being used by HNP to capture changes in a household’s ability to access food over time include the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) with a range of 0-27, the Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) with a range of 0-12, and the Months of Adequate Household Food Provisioning (MAHFP) score with a range of 0-12. Of the 104 HIV-infected drug naïve women enrolled in the study thus far, 49% live on less than USD 1.00 per day and spend less than USD 5.00 per year for purchases of medicine. Preliminary findings show that at baseline, their mean (SD) age, CD4 cell count, Hemoglobin (Hb), and Body Mass Index (BMI) were 34.8 (7.0), 502 (212), 12.4 (1.6), and 22.4 (3.7), respectively. The HFIAS score (SD) of 7 (2.4) and a 42.7% prevalence of severe food insecurity reflected household worry due to inadequate food, and the consumption of fewer or small meals. The MAHFP score (SD) was 5.24 (2.7) with majority of the households having limited access to food during the months of July (74%), August (83%), and September (72%). The HDDS (SD) of 6.10 (1.9) suggests a prevalence of low food diversity in diets. With the exception of milk, which is mostly consumed in tea, there was very minimal consumption of animal source foods. The scores for these proxy measures of household food insecurity indicate that though the current CD4 counts and Body Mass Indices (BMI) of the study population are within the normal range, their habitual diets are likely to be poor due to the high prevalence of food insecurity.This publication was made possible through support provided by the Office of Agriculture, Bureau of Economic Growth, Agriculture and Trade, under Grant No. PCE-G-00-98-00036-00 to University of California, Davis. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID