AbstractAttention may be biased towards faces but a face advantage may be linked to the upright orientation of a face. Three experiments, employing a flanker and a cuing paradigm, investigated effects of face orientation, perceptual load and allocation of attention. Experiment 1 demonstrated that, irrespective of load, attention is biased towards upright face distractors while inverted face distractors are easy to ignore. Experiment 2 verified that inverted face distractors can interfere provided that they are attended to volitionally, likely because the volitional allocation of attention promotes face processing and gender classification (Experiment 3)
Upright faces are thought to engage holistic processing whereby local regions are integrated into a ...
UnrestrictedInverted faces are recognized more slowly and less accurately than upright faces (Yin, 1...
The mechanisms held responsible for familiar face recognition are thought to be orientation dependen...
AbstractWhen faces are turned upside-down, many aspects of face processing are severely disrupted. H...
When faces are turned upside-down, many aspects of face processing are severely disrupted. Here we r...
Inversion disproportionately impairs recognition of face stimuli compared to non-face stimuli arguab...
When faces are turned upside-down they are much more difficult to recognize than other objects. This...
AbstractHumans are remarkably adept at recognizing objects across a wide range of views. A notable e...
Research over the past 25 years indicates that stimulus processing is diminished when attention is e...
Research over the past 25 years indicates that stimulus processing is diminished when attention is e...
In the present study, we investigated whether faces have an advantage in retaining attention over ot...
Abstract: It is well-established that faces and bodies cue observers’ visuospatial attention; for ex...
People have particular difficulty ignoring distractors that depict faces. This phenomenon has been a...
AbstractFace inversion effects are used as evidence that faces are processed differently from object...
AbstractPrevious research suggests that observers use information near the eyes and eyebrows to iden...
Upright faces are thought to engage holistic processing whereby local regions are integrated into a ...
UnrestrictedInverted faces are recognized more slowly and less accurately than upright faces (Yin, 1...
The mechanisms held responsible for familiar face recognition are thought to be orientation dependen...
AbstractWhen faces are turned upside-down, many aspects of face processing are severely disrupted. H...
When faces are turned upside-down, many aspects of face processing are severely disrupted. Here we r...
Inversion disproportionately impairs recognition of face stimuli compared to non-face stimuli arguab...
When faces are turned upside-down they are much more difficult to recognize than other objects. This...
AbstractHumans are remarkably adept at recognizing objects across a wide range of views. A notable e...
Research over the past 25 years indicates that stimulus processing is diminished when attention is e...
Research over the past 25 years indicates that stimulus processing is diminished when attention is e...
In the present study, we investigated whether faces have an advantage in retaining attention over ot...
Abstract: It is well-established that faces and bodies cue observers’ visuospatial attention; for ex...
People have particular difficulty ignoring distractors that depict faces. This phenomenon has been a...
AbstractFace inversion effects are used as evidence that faces are processed differently from object...
AbstractPrevious research suggests that observers use information near the eyes and eyebrows to iden...
Upright faces are thought to engage holistic processing whereby local regions are integrated into a ...
UnrestrictedInverted faces are recognized more slowly and less accurately than upright faces (Yin, 1...
The mechanisms held responsible for familiar face recognition are thought to be orientation dependen...