AbstractThe present paper deals with the objection that Paul Humphreys raised against the propensity interpretation of probability – “Humphreys’ paradox”. An update on existing solutions is offered, and it is concluded that none of them is completely satisfactory in view of Humphreys’ 2004 rejoinder. Positively, an original solution is formulated and discussed
Using “brute reason” I will show why there can be only one valid interpretation of probability. The ...
A pragmatic account of scientific understanding is used both to examine and to unify fundamental que...
In this paper it is argued that three of the most prominent theories of conditional acceptance face ...
The present paper deals with the objection that Paul Humphreys raised against the propensity interpr...
Abstract (for The Review of Metaphysics): This paper outlines a genuinely pragmatist conception of p...
I analyse critically what I regard as the most accomplished empiricist account of propensities, name...
Abstract (for The Review of Metaphysics): This paper outlines a genuinely pragmatist conception of p...
I analyse critically what I regard as the most accomplished empiricist account of propensities, name...
Several arguments against various propensity analyses of probability are proposed. Though not all of...
Humphreys� Paradox (Humphreys 1985) can be solved if propensity theorists (i) adopt R�nyi�s 1955 pro...
In this dissertation I aim to clarify the concept of probability. There are three kinds of interpret...
This paper calls for a re-appraisal of McGee's analysis of the semantics, logic and probabilities of...
I analyse critically what I regard as the most accomplished empiricist account of propensities, name...
I review five explicit attempts throughout the history of quantum mechanics to invoke dispositional ...
Using “brute reason” I will show why there can be only one valid interpretation of probability. The ...
A pragmatic account of scientific understanding is used both to examine and to unify fundamental que...
In this paper it is argued that three of the most prominent theories of conditional acceptance face ...
The present paper deals with the objection that Paul Humphreys raised against the propensity interpr...
Abstract (for The Review of Metaphysics): This paper outlines a genuinely pragmatist conception of p...
I analyse critically what I regard as the most accomplished empiricist account of propensities, name...
Abstract (for The Review of Metaphysics): This paper outlines a genuinely pragmatist conception of p...
I analyse critically what I regard as the most accomplished empiricist account of propensities, name...
Several arguments against various propensity analyses of probability are proposed. Though not all of...
Humphreys� Paradox (Humphreys 1985) can be solved if propensity theorists (i) adopt R�nyi�s 1955 pro...
In this dissertation I aim to clarify the concept of probability. There are three kinds of interpret...
This paper calls for a re-appraisal of McGee's analysis of the semantics, logic and probabilities of...
I analyse critically what I regard as the most accomplished empiricist account of propensities, name...
I review five explicit attempts throughout the history of quantum mechanics to invoke dispositional ...
Using “brute reason” I will show why there can be only one valid interpretation of probability. The ...
A pragmatic account of scientific understanding is used both to examine and to unify fundamental que...
In this paper it is argued that three of the most prominent theories of conditional acceptance face ...
DOI
Add to ORKG