AbstractWe examine the issue of weak and strong fairness in the framework of Milner's CCS. Our approach is operational. We address the problem of giving sets of finite rules for generating all and only the admissible execution sequences when fairness is assumed. We achieve our aims by defining two calculi, one for weak and the other for strong fairness. Both calculi are extensions of standard CCS. In neither case do we appeal to random assignment or to transformations. A distinguishing feature of the weak fair calculus, unlike standard approaches which appeal to random assignment, is that it does not involve predictive choice
AbstractWe answer an open question of Costa and Hennessy and present a characterization of the infin...
AbstractWe construct several denotational semantics for communicating processes that incorporate ass...
Strong fairness is a notion we can use to ensure that an element that is enabled infinitely often i...
AbstractWe examine the issue of weak and strong fairness in the framework of Milner's CCS. Our appro...
International audienceIn this paper we investigate fair computations in the $\pi$-calculus \cite{MPW...
AbstractIn this paper, we define fair computations in the π-calculus [Milner, R., Parrow, J. & Walke...
AbstractIn this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defin...
AbstractIn this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defin...
AbstractIn the analysis and design of concurrent systems, it can be useful to assume fairness among ...
AbstractWe provide proof rules enabling the treatment of two fairness assumptions in the context of ...
AbstractVarious principles of proof have been proposed to reason about fairness. This paper addresse...
International audienceIn this paper, we define fair computations in the pi-calculus. We follow Costa...
Notions of weak and strong fairness are studied in the setting of the I/O automaton model of Lynch &...
In this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defined by Co...
In this paper, we define fair computations in the π-calculus [18]. We follow Costa and Stirling’s ap...
AbstractWe answer an open question of Costa and Hennessy and present a characterization of the infin...
AbstractWe construct several denotational semantics for communicating processes that incorporate ass...
Strong fairness is a notion we can use to ensure that an element that is enabled infinitely often i...
AbstractWe examine the issue of weak and strong fairness in the framework of Milner's CCS. Our appro...
International audienceIn this paper we investigate fair computations in the $\pi$-calculus \cite{MPW...
AbstractIn this paper, we define fair computations in the π-calculus [Milner, R., Parrow, J. & Walke...
AbstractIn this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defin...
AbstractIn this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defin...
AbstractIn the analysis and design of concurrent systems, it can be useful to assume fairness among ...
AbstractWe provide proof rules enabling the treatment of two fairness assumptions in the context of ...
AbstractVarious principles of proof have been proposed to reason about fairness. This paper addresse...
International audienceIn this paper, we define fair computations in the pi-calculus. We follow Costa...
Notions of weak and strong fairness are studied in the setting of the I/O automaton model of Lynch &...
In this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defined by Co...
In this paper, we define fair computations in the π-calculus [18]. We follow Costa and Stirling’s ap...
AbstractWe answer an open question of Costa and Hennessy and present a characterization of the infin...
AbstractWe construct several denotational semantics for communicating processes that incorporate ass...
Strong fairness is a notion we can use to ensure that an element that is enabled infinitely often i...