AbstractThere are at least two ways to interpret numerical degrees of belief in terms of betting:1.You can offer to bet at the odds defined by the degrees of belief.2.You can make the judgement that a strategy for taking advantage of such betting offers will not multiply the capital it risks by a large factor.Both interpretations can be applied to ordinary additive probabilities and used to justify updating by conditioning. Only the second can be applied to Dempster–Shafer degrees of belief and used to justify Dempster’s rule of combination
Application of the Bayes' formula leaves little room for representation of ignorance and vagueness i...
\u27!\u27here is considerable literature which concludes that the average person does not understand...
Accurate measurements of probabilistic beliefs have become increasingly important both in practice a...
AbstractThere are at least two ways to interpret numerical degrees of belief in terms of betting:1.Y...
The paper’s target is the historically influential betting interpretation of subjective probabilitie...
We consider a fundamental problem for the betting interpretation of degrees of belief: There is a se...
Probabilism is committed to two theses: 1) Opinion comes in degrees-call them degrees of belief, or ...
AbstractSmets and Kennes have claimed that the transferable belief model, a decision and inference p...
The "Dutch Book" argument, tracing back to Rarnsey (1926) and deFinetti (1974), offers prudential gr...
AbstractThe Dempster–Shafer (DS) theory of probabilistic reasoning is presented in terms of a semant...
Betting methods, of which de Finetti's Dutch Book is by far the most well-known, are uncertainty mod...
Shafer’s belief functions were introduced in the seventies of the previous century as a mathematical...
Bayesianism is the claim that scientific reasoning is\ud probabilistic, and that probabilities are a...
The investigation reported in this paper aims at clarifying an important yet subtle distinction betw...
1) Opinion comes in degrees—call them degrees of belief, or credences. 2) The degrees of belief of a...
Application of the Bayes' formula leaves little room for representation of ignorance and vagueness i...
\u27!\u27here is considerable literature which concludes that the average person does not understand...
Accurate measurements of probabilistic beliefs have become increasingly important both in practice a...
AbstractThere are at least two ways to interpret numerical degrees of belief in terms of betting:1.Y...
The paper’s target is the historically influential betting interpretation of subjective probabilitie...
We consider a fundamental problem for the betting interpretation of degrees of belief: There is a se...
Probabilism is committed to two theses: 1) Opinion comes in degrees-call them degrees of belief, or ...
AbstractSmets and Kennes have claimed that the transferable belief model, a decision and inference p...
The "Dutch Book" argument, tracing back to Rarnsey (1926) and deFinetti (1974), offers prudential gr...
AbstractThe Dempster–Shafer (DS) theory of probabilistic reasoning is presented in terms of a semant...
Betting methods, of which de Finetti's Dutch Book is by far the most well-known, are uncertainty mod...
Shafer’s belief functions were introduced in the seventies of the previous century as a mathematical...
Bayesianism is the claim that scientific reasoning is\ud probabilistic, and that probabilities are a...
The investigation reported in this paper aims at clarifying an important yet subtle distinction betw...
1) Opinion comes in degrees—call them degrees of belief, or credences. 2) The degrees of belief of a...
Application of the Bayes' formula leaves little room for representation of ignorance and vagueness i...
\u27!\u27here is considerable literature which concludes that the average person does not understand...
Accurate measurements of probabilistic beliefs have become increasingly important both in practice a...