Comparing Methods for Identifying Future High-Cost Mental Health Cases in Medicaid

AbstractObjectiveThis article examines methods for identifying future high-cost cases of Medicaid-covered mental health care services.MethodsFlorida Medicaid claims data are used to compare methods based on prior cost, and concurrent and prospective diagnosis-based models. Individuals with prior year expenditures in the top decile or with predicted expenditures in the top decile from the diagnosis-based models were expected to be high-cost individuals.ResultsIndividuals in the top decile of prior year costs averaged $13,684 (US dollars) in costs in the following year with 50% remaining in the top decile of spending. Individuals classified as high cost by diagnosis-based models averaged $10,935 to $10,974, with 34% meeting the criteria for a high-cost case in the following year.ConclusionIn contrast to research on high-costs cases for physical health care, prior cost was superior to diagnosis-based models at identifying future high cases for mental health care