Academics should be engaged with the wider world, but impact, if it is routinised, loses its potential to change the dynamic of a system. Chris Hackley writes that the research that influences policy should be celebrated but we must be wary of the risk that the impact measurement will begin to define what is to be measured
© 2017, © 2017 Society for Research into Higher Education. The principle that research should demons...
This paper considers whether the impact agenda that has developed over the last decade in UK univers...
James Lloyd’s recent post “Should academics be expected to change policy? Six reasons why it is unre...
It’s understandable that academics whose research area does not lend itself to impact and those whos...
Since the Research Excellence Framework of 2014 (REF2014) ‘impact’ has created a conceptual conundru...
The questions of defining ‘impact’ and confirming the value of academic research are hot topics for ...
The ‘impact agenda’ for academic research denotes a set of policies which encourage and incentivise ...
Following on from the recent debate at the ‘From Research to Policy: Academic Impacts on Government’...
The current approach to measuring and assessing research impact favours certain kinds of academics a...
Wary of the pressure that researchers are under to demonstrate impact, Louise Shaxson injects a dose...
This article reviews the advice from the academic and 'grey' literatures to identify a list of dos a...
Pressures have increasingly been put upon social scientists to prove their economic, cultural and so...
While academic social science is extremely effective at generating public value, it is less adept at...
U.K. policy is to embed “knowledge transfer as a permanent core activity in universities...
UK social scientists feel a growing pressure to achieve policy change. In reality, this process is m...
© 2017, © 2017 Society for Research into Higher Education. The principle that research should demons...
This paper considers whether the impact agenda that has developed over the last decade in UK univers...
James Lloyd’s recent post “Should academics be expected to change policy? Six reasons why it is unre...
It’s understandable that academics whose research area does not lend itself to impact and those whos...
Since the Research Excellence Framework of 2014 (REF2014) ‘impact’ has created a conceptual conundru...
The questions of defining ‘impact’ and confirming the value of academic research are hot topics for ...
The ‘impact agenda’ for academic research denotes a set of policies which encourage and incentivise ...
Following on from the recent debate at the ‘From Research to Policy: Academic Impacts on Government’...
The current approach to measuring and assessing research impact favours certain kinds of academics a...
Wary of the pressure that researchers are under to demonstrate impact, Louise Shaxson injects a dose...
This article reviews the advice from the academic and 'grey' literatures to identify a list of dos a...
Pressures have increasingly been put upon social scientists to prove their economic, cultural and so...
While academic social science is extremely effective at generating public value, it is less adept at...
U.K. policy is to embed “knowledge transfer as a permanent core activity in universities...
UK social scientists feel a growing pressure to achieve policy change. In reality, this process is m...
© 2017, © 2017 Society for Research into Higher Education. The principle that research should demons...
This paper considers whether the impact agenda that has developed over the last decade in UK univers...
James Lloyd’s recent post “Should academics be expected to change policy? Six reasons why it is unre...