Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court’s 8:3 ruling against the government is measured and restrained in tone – but it is the most important constitutional case the Court has ever heard, writes Jo Murkens. The Justices have ruled that the government cannot leave the EU without Parliament’s consent. And while they also declared EU membership a reserved matter and therefore one that must be decided at Westminster rather than by the Northern Ireland Assembly, this is unlikely to be the end of the story
The simple outcome of Miller 2 is that the Executive lost, and Parliament returned to work. However,...
After the Brexit referendum in 23 June 2016 both the EU and the UK were led to a political turmoil o...
In a referendum held on June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom voted in favour of leaving the European Un...
The Supreme Court’s ruling against the government is measured and restrained in tone – but it is the...
An unprecedented eleven-member UK Supreme Court decided R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting ...
The mythical Art.50 TEU gives Member States the option to withdraw from the EU ‘in accordance with i...
his note examines the UK Supreme Court's judgment in the Brexit case, Miller v Secretary of State fo...
The High Court has ruled that Parliament must be consulted before Article 50 is triggered and Britai...
This article analyses the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court determining the UK’s ‘constitution...
The European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 authorised the Prime Minister to give notic...
In “the constitutional case of the century”, the UK Supreme Court concluded that the Government did ...
The Supreme Court in Miller upheld the Divisional Court, and decided that the government could not t...
The Miller case was of great interest to the legal and political establishment. But was it a landmar...
On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom voted, unexpectedly, to leave the European Union. That such a d...
In the United Kingdom (UK), tensions between the executive and the judiciary reignited recently whe...
The simple outcome of Miller 2 is that the Executive lost, and Parliament returned to work. However,...
After the Brexit referendum in 23 June 2016 both the EU and the UK were led to a political turmoil o...
In a referendum held on June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom voted in favour of leaving the European Un...
The Supreme Court’s ruling against the government is measured and restrained in tone – but it is the...
An unprecedented eleven-member UK Supreme Court decided R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting ...
The mythical Art.50 TEU gives Member States the option to withdraw from the EU ‘in accordance with i...
his note examines the UK Supreme Court's judgment in the Brexit case, Miller v Secretary of State fo...
The High Court has ruled that Parliament must be consulted before Article 50 is triggered and Britai...
This article analyses the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court determining the UK’s ‘constitution...
The European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 authorised the Prime Minister to give notic...
In “the constitutional case of the century”, the UK Supreme Court concluded that the Government did ...
The Supreme Court in Miller upheld the Divisional Court, and decided that the government could not t...
The Miller case was of great interest to the legal and political establishment. But was it a landmar...
On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom voted, unexpectedly, to leave the European Union. That such a d...
In the United Kingdom (UK), tensions between the executive and the judiciary reignited recently whe...
The simple outcome of Miller 2 is that the Executive lost, and Parliament returned to work. However,...
After the Brexit referendum in 23 June 2016 both the EU and the UK were led to a political turmoil o...
In a referendum held on June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom voted in favour of leaving the European Un...