Ecological and usual farm storage specifications comparison and dominance to sheeps

The aim of the present work was to compare sheeps health in different farms with different feed and keeping. The material was taken four months in a row. Blood and milk samples were taken. In recent years the growing popularity of an ecological animal husbandry. One of its branches are organic sheeps. From conventional organic farms differ is that they use only organic feed, and better product quality, it is less environmental pollution, ensure an adequate stock holding. The production of organic sheeps farm focuses on housing conditions, feeding and health status. The conclusion of appropriate animal housing and care prevents many illnesses and treatments. Good condition of farm animals has shown that keeping conditions are good. So we had to research are organic farmed sheeps more healthy than others. Under normal conditions, kept sheep milk conditions was worse than the stored in organic farm. Milk of the sheeps in organic farm was better and we found more proteins, lactose, and lower stock of fat. The milk tests showed that the organic farm's sheep milk somatic cell count is lower. At usual farm sheep milk somatic cell counts were higher in the milk meets the requirements of lower-class milk. Organic sheep farm in blood biochemical parameters were on limits. We found out more calcium, phosphorus, magnesium at organic kept sheeps blood. Under normal storage conditions, kept sheeps blood biochemical parameters were not within the normal range. Number of blood biochemical findings, we see that the organic farm's sheeps, the blood glucose level was higher than in normal sheeps farm. We found out that different feeding and storage conditions affected the health status of the sheeps. At ecologic farm we counted 22 casess of ilness, and in common farm we counted 301cases of mastitis, footrot, laminitis. At organic sheeps farm we found lower frequency