Hip revision arthroplasty (long-term results)

Objective. To evaluate the risk factors after total hip replacement arthroplasty for rerevision and to analyze complications after hip revision surgery. Material and methods. We obtained data from 117 hip revisions and 12 hip rerevision arthroplasties performed in 1992–2001 in the Department of Orthopedics of Klaipėda Hospital. Special forms were filled in for every patient who participated in the study. Name, operation date, type of implants, operative technique, revision diagnosis, intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. All patients were checked for death until 2003. Results. Hip revisions were performed for 77 (66%) women and 50 (44%) men in 1992–2001. We revised 22 (19%) cups, 6 (5%) stems, 86 (74%) total hip revisions; femoral head was exchanged for 3 patients. Revision diagnoses were: aseptic loosening in 106 (90%) cases, recurrent dislocations in 7 (6%) cases, and periprosthetic fractures in 4 (4%) cases. Patients’ age varied from 26–82 years, average 63.5 years. In revision group only 8% of patients were less than 50 years old, compared to 33% in rerevision group. Morselized allografts and bone impaction technique for reconstruction of bone defects were used in 70 (60%) of cases. We rerevised one cup only for which revision morselized allografts were used. Eight (67%) rerevisions were performed after first 28 (24%) hip revisions. Conclusions. Patients, who underwent revision surgery being younger than 50 years old, were at higher risk for rerevision surgery. Revision with morselized bone