An evaluation of the feasibility and validity of a patient-administered Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (’MUST’) compared to Health Care Professional screening in an Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) outpatient clinic

Background: Malnutrition is common in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and is associated with poor health outcomes. Despite this, screening for malnutrition in the outpatient-setting is not routine and research in the area is limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether agreement between malnutrition screening completed by patients and Healthcare Professionals (HCP’s) could be achieved by comparing patient self-administered ‘MUST’ (‘MUST’-P) to HCP administered ‘MUST’ (‘MUST’-HCP) in a single tertiary IBD outpatient clinic. Methods: We conducted a feasibility and validity study on adult outpatients with IBD. We collected anthropometric, nutritional and clinical data from patients. All patients completed ‘MUST’-P using a self-administered questionnaire, followed by ‘MUST’-HCP. ‘MUST’-P was timed and feedback on ease-of-use was obtained. Malnutrition risk was classified as low (score=0), medium (score=1), and high (score≥2) and agreement tested using kappa statistics (κ). Results: Eighty patients were recruited (Crohn’s Disease:n=49, Ulcerative Colitis:n=29, Unclassified:n=2), with mean age 39.9±SD:15.1yrs, 51.2% were males. Seventy one (92%) of patients found ‘MUST’-P either easy or very easy. The mean time to complete ‘MUST’-P was 3.1±1.8min (range 1-10min). Sixty-eight (85%) of patients were at low risk of malnutrition when screened by the HCP. There was moderate agreement (κ=0.486, p