It is axiomatic that once an invention has been patented, it cannot be patented again. This aligns with the quid pro quo theory of patents—the public would receive nothing new in exchange for the second patent. Enforcing this rule is done through the novelty requirement, which bars a patent if the invention is already known. But the rule is hard to justify if the original patentee reneged on the quid pro quo by inadequately disclosing how to make and use the invention. The inadequate disclosure suggests that the original inventor did not invent anything and the public received no benefit from the original patent. Nevertheless, the current novelty rules prevent the subject matter from being patented again, even if a subsequent researcher can...
Unlike other forms of intellectual property, patents are universally justified on utilitarian ground...
Unlike other forms of intellectual property, patents are universally justified on utilitarian ground...
Courts, the Patent Office, and commentators are in vigorous disagreement about what types of innovat...
It is axiomatic that once an invention has been patented, it cannot be patented again. This aligns w...
It is axiomatic that once an invention has been patented, it cannot be patented again. This aligns w...
It is axiomatic that once an invention has been patented, it cannot be patented again. This aligns w...
The novelty requirement seeks to ensure that a patent will not issue if the public already possesses...
The novelty requirement seeks to ensure that a patent will not issue if the public already possesses...
A bedrock principle of patent law is that old inventions cannot be patented. And a new use for an ol...
Patents and trade secrecy have long been considered substitute incentives for innovation. When inven...
Patents and trade secrecy have long been considered substitute incentives for innovation. When inven...
The most fundamental requirement of patent law is that a patented invention must be new. Given the l...
The most fundamental requirement of patent law is that a patented invention must be new. Given the l...
The novelty requirement seeks to ensure that a patent will not issue if the public already possesses...
Patents and trade secrecy have long been considered substitute incentives for innovation. When inven...
Unlike other forms of intellectual property, patents are universally justified on utilitarian ground...
Unlike other forms of intellectual property, patents are universally justified on utilitarian ground...
Courts, the Patent Office, and commentators are in vigorous disagreement about what types of innovat...
It is axiomatic that once an invention has been patented, it cannot be patented again. This aligns w...
It is axiomatic that once an invention has been patented, it cannot be patented again. This aligns w...
It is axiomatic that once an invention has been patented, it cannot be patented again. This aligns w...
The novelty requirement seeks to ensure that a patent will not issue if the public already possesses...
The novelty requirement seeks to ensure that a patent will not issue if the public already possesses...
A bedrock principle of patent law is that old inventions cannot be patented. And a new use for an ol...
Patents and trade secrecy have long been considered substitute incentives for innovation. When inven...
Patents and trade secrecy have long been considered substitute incentives for innovation. When inven...
The most fundamental requirement of patent law is that a patented invention must be new. Given the l...
The most fundamental requirement of patent law is that a patented invention must be new. Given the l...
The novelty requirement seeks to ensure that a patent will not issue if the public already possesses...
Patents and trade secrecy have long been considered substitute incentives for innovation. When inven...
Unlike other forms of intellectual property, patents are universally justified on utilitarian ground...
Unlike other forms of intellectual property, patents are universally justified on utilitarian ground...
Courts, the Patent Office, and commentators are in vigorous disagreement about what types of innovat...