This segment of the project contains the offense seriousness portion of the simplified sentencing table employed in the Model Sentencing Guidelines. The Article also contains drafter\u27s commentary explaining the offense seriousness scale of the table, how it interacts with other portions of the Model Guidelines, and the policy choices behind the simplified table
The Columbia Law Review\u27s Symposium on sentencing, which took place less than two weeks after the...
This article argues that in addition to the swing toward increased judicial discretion and overall l...
This essay introducing the June 2006 edition of the Federal Sentencing Reporter (Vol. 18, No. 5) des...
This segment of the project contains the offense seriousness portion of the simplified sentencing ta...
This Article is the ninth of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed t...
This Article is the first of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed t...
In 1987, the Nation’s first attempt to standardize federal sentencing came in the form of the United...
This Article is the second of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed ...
This Article is the third of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed t...
This Article is the tenth of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed t...
This Article proposes a simplified sentencing table consisting of nine base sentencing ranges, each ...
We are accustomed to thinking about the criminal law, and the procedures for enforcing it, as divide...
This Article is the twelfth of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed...
The Article first provides an overview of the history and prevailing motivations behind the promulga...
In 1984, Congress mandated the creation of the United States Sentencing Commission composed of presi...
The Columbia Law Review\u27s Symposium on sentencing, which took place less than two weeks after the...
This article argues that in addition to the swing toward increased judicial discretion and overall l...
This essay introducing the June 2006 edition of the Federal Sentencing Reporter (Vol. 18, No. 5) des...
This segment of the project contains the offense seriousness portion of the simplified sentencing ta...
This Article is the ninth of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed t...
This Article is the first of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed t...
In 1987, the Nation’s first attempt to standardize federal sentencing came in the form of the United...
This Article is the second of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed ...
This Article is the third of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed t...
This Article is the tenth of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed t...
This Article proposes a simplified sentencing table consisting of nine base sentencing ranges, each ...
We are accustomed to thinking about the criminal law, and the procedures for enforcing it, as divide...
This Article is the twelfth of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed...
The Article first provides an overview of the history and prevailing motivations behind the promulga...
In 1984, Congress mandated the creation of the United States Sentencing Commission composed of presi...
The Columbia Law Review\u27s Symposium on sentencing, which took place less than two weeks after the...
This article argues that in addition to the swing toward increased judicial discretion and overall l...
This essay introducing the June 2006 edition of the Federal Sentencing Reporter (Vol. 18, No. 5) des...