Nearly twenty years ago, speaking of the difficulties inherent in managing mass tort cases, Chief Justice William Rehnquist predicted that without coordinated state and federal mechanisms, lawyers would seek to pursue duplicative and exhaustive litigation. And some courts, operating under a parochial view of the situation, would allow them to do so. He warned that the result would be expense, delay, resulting crowding of dockets, divergent decisions on identical factual questions, and sometimes the insolvency of the defendants who are being sued. Despite this and similar warnings, expensive and exhaustive litigation is exactly what has happened in many cases
Part I introduces the central themes in the law of federal question jurisdiction. It describes the p...
Over the last three decades, the Rehnquist and Roberts Courts have carried out a quiet revolution in...
The potential for attorneys to collude in reaching a settlement agreement arises in any large-scal...
Nearly twenty years ago, speaking of the difficulties inherent in managing mass tort cases, Chief Ju...
In 2004, just five years after introducing the drug, Vioxx, pharmaceutical company, Merck, voluntari...
There is no justification for displacing state tort law by adopting a new federal law of torts in or...
The topic of Mass and Repetitive Litigation in the Federal Courts is even more vast and unwieldy t...
Over the past forty years, we have vastly increased our information about courts. New methods of rec...
The role of courts in mass tort litigation is examined. The courts\u27 interests in such cases, the ...
This article examines the history of federal courts and the repeated efforts made over the centuries...
For thirty years, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have relied on active Judicial case managemen...
Although it is destined for the personal jurisdiction canon, the Supreme Court’s eight-to-one decisi...
Congestion in the federal judiciary is so prevalent that it has become an afterthought. From the out...
Although most current proposals for consolidation adjudication of mass tort cases call for these cas...
It is by now axiomatic that the objective of the civil lawsuit has evolved. Litigants no longer rout...
Part I introduces the central themes in the law of federal question jurisdiction. It describes the p...
Over the last three decades, the Rehnquist and Roberts Courts have carried out a quiet revolution in...
The potential for attorneys to collude in reaching a settlement agreement arises in any large-scal...
Nearly twenty years ago, speaking of the difficulties inherent in managing mass tort cases, Chief Ju...
In 2004, just five years after introducing the drug, Vioxx, pharmaceutical company, Merck, voluntari...
There is no justification for displacing state tort law by adopting a new federal law of torts in or...
The topic of Mass and Repetitive Litigation in the Federal Courts is even more vast and unwieldy t...
Over the past forty years, we have vastly increased our information about courts. New methods of rec...
The role of courts in mass tort litigation is examined. The courts\u27 interests in such cases, the ...
This article examines the history of federal courts and the repeated efforts made over the centuries...
For thirty years, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have relied on active Judicial case managemen...
Although it is destined for the personal jurisdiction canon, the Supreme Court’s eight-to-one decisi...
Congestion in the federal judiciary is so prevalent that it has become an afterthought. From the out...
Although most current proposals for consolidation adjudication of mass tort cases call for these cas...
It is by now axiomatic that the objective of the civil lawsuit has evolved. Litigants no longer rout...
Part I introduces the central themes in the law of federal question jurisdiction. It describes the p...
Over the last three decades, the Rehnquist and Roberts Courts have carried out a quiet revolution in...
The potential for attorneys to collude in reaching a settlement agreement arises in any large-scal...