In Southeast Missouri Hospital v. C.R. Bard, Inc., the Eighth Circuit passed on an opportunity to choose a bundled discount test and instead focused on the proper market for the products at issue. This Note first explores the bundled discounts and contracts at issue in the instant decision. It then provides a detailed explanation of bundled discounts and the various tests proposed for them, as well as an explanation of the Eighth Circuit’s precedent concerning bundled discounts. The Note concludes by analyzing the instant decision and discussing why the court should have addressed bundled discounts in its opinion and the consequences of its failure to do so
This article asserts a comprehensive response to Elhauge’s provocative arguments. With respect to ty...
The FRAND commitment is an important tool to balance the incentives between SEPs holders and downstr...
In LePage’s v. 3M, the Third Circuit decided the first case at the federal appellate court level th...
In Southeast Missouri Hospital v. C.R. Bard, Inc., the Eighth Circuit passed on an opportunity to ch...
Most courts and commentators agree that the ultimate goal of antitrust is efficiency. Accordingly, a...
This Summary will analyze the reasoning utilized in the various district court decisions since LePag...
A bundled discount occurs when a seller charges less for a bundle of goods than for its components w...
The discounting practices of dominant firms has emerged as one of the most problematic areas of priv...
This article identifies and critiques five attempts courts and commentators have made at articulatin...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently joined the cadre of courts to uph...
In this paper, we explore the competitive significance of both bundled and loyalty discounts. The pa...
Recent decisions-all relying on a stylized example first provided by the Ortho court-hold that a mul...
In United States v. Berger, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit departed from the Second and ...
In McGann v. H & H Music Co., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit enraged AIDS ...
This Note analyzes the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit\u27s standard of review ...
This article asserts a comprehensive response to Elhauge’s provocative arguments. With respect to ty...
The FRAND commitment is an important tool to balance the incentives between SEPs holders and downstr...
In LePage’s v. 3M, the Third Circuit decided the first case at the federal appellate court level th...
In Southeast Missouri Hospital v. C.R. Bard, Inc., the Eighth Circuit passed on an opportunity to ch...
Most courts and commentators agree that the ultimate goal of antitrust is efficiency. Accordingly, a...
This Summary will analyze the reasoning utilized in the various district court decisions since LePag...
A bundled discount occurs when a seller charges less for a bundle of goods than for its components w...
The discounting practices of dominant firms has emerged as one of the most problematic areas of priv...
This article identifies and critiques five attempts courts and commentators have made at articulatin...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently joined the cadre of courts to uph...
In this paper, we explore the competitive significance of both bundled and loyalty discounts. The pa...
Recent decisions-all relying on a stylized example first provided by the Ortho court-hold that a mul...
In United States v. Berger, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit departed from the Second and ...
In McGann v. H & H Music Co., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit enraged AIDS ...
This Note analyzes the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit\u27s standard of review ...
This article asserts a comprehensive response to Elhauge’s provocative arguments. With respect to ty...
The FRAND commitment is an important tool to balance the incentives between SEPs holders and downstr...
In LePage’s v. 3M, the Third Circuit decided the first case at the federal appellate court level th...