The proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2013 will ban courts from enforcing arbitration agreements in the employment and consumer contexts. This law will protect America\u27s employees and consumers by keeping the courthouse door open to critical civil rights, employment, and consumer protection litigation. However, the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act suffers from a subtle flaw: it is uncertain whether the law will apply to the states. This flaw, which arises from one of the greatest constitutional errors the Supreme Court has ever made, must be corrected in order to provide the broadest protection to millions of American employees and consumers, and to prevent years of needless litigation and confusion
The American system of arbitration is constantly evolving. From the first formal arbitration tribun...
Spanning nearly forty years, the Supreme Court has issued multiple decisions and stated categoricall...
Arbitration clauses in contracts require consumers to waive their rights to bring litigation in cour...
The proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2013 will ban courts from enforcing arbitration agreements ...
Providing an extensive historical overview of federal arbitration jurisprudence and the Federal Arbi...
The Supreme Court has actively expanded the Federal Arbitration Act into realms not originally conte...
The Federal Arbitration Act (the Act), seeks to eliminate centuries of perceived judicial hostility ...
Businesses are accused of using arbitration as a private dispute resolution system that shields thei...
The proposed Arbitration Fairness Act (AFA) would prohibit all pre-dispute agreements to arbitrate i...
In 1925, Congress enacted the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) as a means of quelling judicial hostilit...
The recent judicial enforcement of class waivers in arbitration agreements has generated ample debat...
Despite talk of a “federalism revival,” state law is quietly losing ground in the U.S. Supreme Court...
The future of commercial arbitration has become a centerpiece of the domestic congressional agenda. ...
On February 12, 2009, lawmakers in the U.S.House of Representatives introduced the Arbitration Fair...
Arbitration, as a form of alternative dispute resolution, is a favored method of settling legal disp...
The American system of arbitration is constantly evolving. From the first formal arbitration tribun...
Spanning nearly forty years, the Supreme Court has issued multiple decisions and stated categoricall...
Arbitration clauses in contracts require consumers to waive their rights to bring litigation in cour...
The proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2013 will ban courts from enforcing arbitration agreements ...
Providing an extensive historical overview of federal arbitration jurisprudence and the Federal Arbi...
The Supreme Court has actively expanded the Federal Arbitration Act into realms not originally conte...
The Federal Arbitration Act (the Act), seeks to eliminate centuries of perceived judicial hostility ...
Businesses are accused of using arbitration as a private dispute resolution system that shields thei...
The proposed Arbitration Fairness Act (AFA) would prohibit all pre-dispute agreements to arbitrate i...
In 1925, Congress enacted the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) as a means of quelling judicial hostilit...
The recent judicial enforcement of class waivers in arbitration agreements has generated ample debat...
Despite talk of a “federalism revival,” state law is quietly losing ground in the U.S. Supreme Court...
The future of commercial arbitration has become a centerpiece of the domestic congressional agenda. ...
On February 12, 2009, lawmakers in the U.S.House of Representatives introduced the Arbitration Fair...
Arbitration, as a form of alternative dispute resolution, is a favored method of settling legal disp...
The American system of arbitration is constantly evolving. From the first formal arbitration tribun...
Spanning nearly forty years, the Supreme Court has issued multiple decisions and stated categoricall...
Arbitration clauses in contracts require consumers to waive their rights to bring litigation in cour...