We begin this article by framing the issue in simple terms. The statute itself is clear. The FAA contains a savings clause that provides that arbitration agreements shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract. , By its terms, the FAA permits courts to refuse to enforce arbitration agreements if the agreement is invalid under state laws that arose to govern issues concerning the validity, revocability, and enforceability of contracts generally
This Article examines the California courts\u27 unconscionability jurisprudence, highlighting the di...
Despite talk of a “federalism revival,” state law is quietly losing ground in the U.S. Supreme Court...
The Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation’s 2013 Symposium focused on the role of the courts and jud...
We begin this article by framing the issue in simple terms. The statute itself is clear. The FAA con...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.Taking as given the existing Supreme Court case...
Arbitration agreements have traditionally been viewed with disfavor.2 Many states have refused to en...
The Federal Arbitration Act ( FAA ) allows for arbitration to be a medium by which parties may settl...
This commentary looks at a Supreme Court case, Imburgia v. DIRECTV, in which the Court faces the que...
Generally, choice-of-law provisions allow corporations that do business in several states or countri...
In Davis v. O\u27Melveny & Myers, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals considered whether an arbitrati...
The Supreme Court held in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion that a California law declaring class arbitrat...
Arbitration clauses in contracts require consumers to waive their rights to bring litigation in cour...
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion represents the latest failed effort by a state to assert some level ...
The Ninth Circuit recently challenged a well-established notion that state laws cannot disrupt arbit...
This Article takes a new approach to resolving the growing tension between the Federal Arbitration A...
This Article examines the California courts\u27 unconscionability jurisprudence, highlighting the di...
Despite talk of a “federalism revival,” state law is quietly losing ground in the U.S. Supreme Court...
The Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation’s 2013 Symposium focused on the role of the courts and jud...
We begin this article by framing the issue in simple terms. The statute itself is clear. The FAA con...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.Taking as given the existing Supreme Court case...
Arbitration agreements have traditionally been viewed with disfavor.2 Many states have refused to en...
The Federal Arbitration Act ( FAA ) allows for arbitration to be a medium by which parties may settl...
This commentary looks at a Supreme Court case, Imburgia v. DIRECTV, in which the Court faces the que...
Generally, choice-of-law provisions allow corporations that do business in several states or countri...
In Davis v. O\u27Melveny & Myers, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals considered whether an arbitrati...
The Supreme Court held in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion that a California law declaring class arbitrat...
Arbitration clauses in contracts require consumers to waive their rights to bring litigation in cour...
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion represents the latest failed effort by a state to assert some level ...
The Ninth Circuit recently challenged a well-established notion that state laws cannot disrupt arbit...
This Article takes a new approach to resolving the growing tension between the Federal Arbitration A...
This Article examines the California courts\u27 unconscionability jurisprudence, highlighting the di...
Despite talk of a “federalism revival,” state law is quietly losing ground in the U.S. Supreme Court...
The Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation’s 2013 Symposium focused on the role of the courts and jud...