Bass v. Nooney Co. established negligent infliction of emotional distress as an independent tort in Missouri. The Missouri Supreme Court, however, left open the question of if and when a bystander can recover under this cause of action. The question remained unanswered for seven years until the Asaro decision. This Note will first analyze that decision, then focus on the traditional rules and restrictions on bystander recovery, and finally set forth for consideration a proposed rule that is less restrictive than the one adopted by the Missouri Supreme Court
Traditionally, Missouri courts have maintained the general rule that a possessor of land owes no dut...
In Missouri, punitive damages are awarded for the purpose of inflicting punishment for wrongdoing, a...
Missouri\u27s workers\u27 compensation law has changed dramatically since its common law inception. ...
Bass v. Nooney Co. established negligent infliction of emotional distress as an independent tort in ...
Recovery for the negligent infliction of emotional distress has always been a hazy and constantly ch...
In Bass v. Nooney Co., the Supreme Court of Missouri abandoned the rule that a defendant is not liab...
The rules governing negligent infliction of emotional distress claims differ significantly from stat...
On the surface, Derousse v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance. Co. may be a relatively minor ma...
In Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, the California Supreme Court held that a plaintiff could r...
Missouri demands “the highest degree of care regarding dangerous instrumentalities because of the gr...
The firefighter\u27s rule bars injured firefighters and police officers from recovering against indi...
As the collateral consequences of court judgments gain increased recognition, courts in many states ...
In Missouri, the doctrine of sovereign immunity has been plagued with confusion. Much of this confus...
This Comment examines the route taken by the Supreme Court of Washington to afford plaintiffs their ...
Bass v. Nooney Co. established negligent infliction of emotional distress as an independent tort in ...
Traditionally, Missouri courts have maintained the general rule that a possessor of land owes no dut...
In Missouri, punitive damages are awarded for the purpose of inflicting punishment for wrongdoing, a...
Missouri\u27s workers\u27 compensation law has changed dramatically since its common law inception. ...
Bass v. Nooney Co. established negligent infliction of emotional distress as an independent tort in ...
Recovery for the negligent infliction of emotional distress has always been a hazy and constantly ch...
In Bass v. Nooney Co., the Supreme Court of Missouri abandoned the rule that a defendant is not liab...
The rules governing negligent infliction of emotional distress claims differ significantly from stat...
On the surface, Derousse v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance. Co. may be a relatively minor ma...
In Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, the California Supreme Court held that a plaintiff could r...
Missouri demands “the highest degree of care regarding dangerous instrumentalities because of the gr...
The firefighter\u27s rule bars injured firefighters and police officers from recovering against indi...
As the collateral consequences of court judgments gain increased recognition, courts in many states ...
In Missouri, the doctrine of sovereign immunity has been plagued with confusion. Much of this confus...
This Comment examines the route taken by the Supreme Court of Washington to afford plaintiffs their ...
Bass v. Nooney Co. established negligent infliction of emotional distress as an independent tort in ...
Traditionally, Missouri courts have maintained the general rule that a possessor of land owes no dut...
In Missouri, punitive damages are awarded for the purpose of inflicting punishment for wrongdoing, a...
Missouri\u27s workers\u27 compensation law has changed dramatically since its common law inception. ...